Posted on 08/20/2021 4:34:06 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
“In 2018, the [couple’s] estate was valued at $1.8 billion and [Hassan] wanted to give her a minuscule fraction,” Huynh’s attorney Pierce O’Donnell claimed in a statement to The Post. “His court position is that she gets nothing: Zero, zip, nada. Every settlement conference, he’s reduced his offer. I haven’t seen that in my 45-year-long career. He’s trying to pull off the ultimate dirty trick on his wife and three teenage children.”
A genius at robotics, Hassan is characterized as a high-tech Dr. Dolittle who can talk to computers.
She immediately suspected her ex-husband of being behind the site. O’Donnell hired forensics pros to figure it out. According to Huynh, they failed and she took matters into her own hands.
“I stayed up all night and discovered a back door that Scott inadvertently did not close. I was able to determine that the Google Drive site [which contained the lawsuit documents] was registered by Scott Wendell — Scott’s middle name. The email contact had ‘Hassan’ in it,” she told The Post. “So the genius of Silicon Valley was exposed by his wife, using her technical knowledge. Poetic justice?”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
“Besides, he wasn’t worth a billon at marriage, it developed as married couple.”
Well, in California divorce law, there’s a concept of “tracing.” If he gets Google stock for $800 for work he did before he got married, it’s considered “separate property.” It doesn’t matter if it appreciates during the marriage to $1,000 or $1 billion, it’s still separate property. Unless he’s actively still earning it by working at Google during the marriage (which he wasn’t) and it was compensation for that work during the marriage (it wasn’t), it’s still separate property and she has no claim on it.
Her best case is that he took the proceeds from his Google windfall and co-mingled it other assets that were community property and the appreciation from those community assets should be split 50-50.
—”it’s still separate property and she has no claim on it.”
OK, but what about the children and their support?
“OK, but what about the children and their support?”
Not sure about California law, but if her lawyers have half a brain the child support is where they gut him like a fish.
I pray for her. He can get rid of her pretty easily. He has enough money and little enough morality to buy whatever he thinks he needs to make the problem disappear.
Remember that Facebook was created to “dis” a girlfriend about her bra size…
He was good at computers, but not so good at women. Haha.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.