[TianaHighrider]

2020 report. Very relevant to today's concerns.

Published online 2020 Jul 15. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11876 PMCID: PMC7405337 PMID: 32774488

[maddog55]

We've been bombarded for years in a wide range of RF frequencies. I'm guessing the 5GHz range is no better or worse than the others:

[LIConFem]

I may just take up smoking again.

[ConservativeMind]

You specifically do not want “ionizing radiation.”

[Intar]

Wireless engineer here: There is no physical health risk from 5G other than obsessive overuse of the internet or texting while driving. Radio waves do not possess the energy to alter DNA or cause adverse reaction to healthy living cells. Radio energy is radiation of low-energy light, not alpha, beta, or gamma (atomic particle based) radiation, which is the ionized radiation that causes harm. Light energy under the ultraviolet band causes no effects on living tissue, and radio bands have far less energy than ultraviolet or higher.

Now if you don't believe me, I can direct you to a site that can teach you how to make a proper tin foil hat to block out the government rays, then we can discuss about a great investment opportunity on the Brooklyn Bridge.

[TianaHighrider]

I know it is a novel idea to read the article if wanting to slam it. But there is a great deal of interesting info on it. And very well cited with 95 documented substantial references.

[iontheball]

If you have designed your brave new world - cyborg project - on a 5G platform, nothing is going to stop it. It’s no different than what’s going on with regard to the critical push to get a ‘shot in every arm,’ which is the 5G connector link built into the ‘vaccines.’

[iontheball]

If you have designed your brave new world - cyborg project - on a 5G platform, nothing is going to stop it. It’s no different than what’s going on with regard to the critical push to get a ‘shot in every arm,’ which is the 5G connector link built into the ‘vaccines.’

[Gene Eric]

Dude who added 5h keyword wonder why searchy no worky

[Intar]

I have one last take on this:

The issue with the scientific community right now is one of political weaponization. Scientists need grants to fund their research or else they are relegated to the classroom. Some scientists love the classroom, but most would rather be in the lab working on their theories. This issue is not an engineering one, but a science one; one party has an agenda to destroy 5G and is willing to fund a research paper to provide "evidence" for their argument (China, china, china...). This is exactly like climate science that relies entirely on government grants to keep climatologists working - without those grants we would likely have no climatologists. The symbiosis here is that the government gets their "evidence" to validate their agenda (get rid of personal liberty because of "OMG, earth will be a ball of liquid hot magma in 10, 8, 2 years from now!!!!!11!!), so the grants are a win-win-lost scenario. The climatologists win by getting their funding, the political class get an excuse to abuse their powers, and the people get the shaft, all on their dime.

I am sure if one looked deeply into this issue, we would see an agenda being pushed rather than any real defense of public health. Oh, and public health and security have been two of the world's most used excuses for government overreach and the setup of dictatorships. Our founding fathers warned against the validity of that excuse.