Posted on 08/18/2021 8:46:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The J&J Delivers spike proteins to the body, which are damaging. That’s what will cut its profits.
RE: The J&J Delivers spike proteins to the body, which are damaging.
And the mRNA vaccines don’t?
Is there an absolute certainty of cause and effect when it comes to these deaths?
Both the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines have regulatory warnings about vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopeni (VITT) now, and data have shown that women under 60 years old appear to be at a higher risk. Symptoms include intracranial pressure, shortness of breath, lethargy, back pain, abdominal pain, spot bleeding under the skin, and leg or arm weakness, as well as positive test results for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Onset occurs a median of 8 or 10 days after receiving the Johnson & Johnson or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, respectively.
CVST, one of the worst manifestations of VITT, happens when clots form in the brain and major dural sinuses. While the average 30-day mortality is 6%, about 10% of patients have permanent neurological issues 1 year later.
Studies look at clotting, myocarditis tied to COVID-19 vaccines | CIDRAP (umn.edu)
Ms. Adams, Victoria, and several others asked the VERIFY team, “Did Johnson & Johnson use cells, derived decades ago from an abortion, to create the vaccine?”
We have three sources for this:
Johnson & Johnson has never made a vaccine, but since entering the pharmaceutical market in 1959, the company has made a lot of headlines — and been fined billions — for bad behavior.
By Richard Gale and Gary Null Ph.D.
I got the J&J mid-March. So far no problems but I”m worried about the spike protein clogging up my capillaries.
Fear of getting sued if their vaccine harms someone?
I got the J&J mid-March. So far no problems but I”m worried about the spike protein clogging up my capillaries.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*pausing to pray that you escape all vaccine harm*
If you are concerned, you may want to investigate N.A.C. and anti-oxidents (vitamin C in twice the amount of N.a.C.) which seem to do some good. :)
The warning about VITT has been known for months, yet, they allowed these vaccines to be given.
Out of 14 million doses of J&J administered in the USA so far, how many cases of VITT have been reported?
More about N.A.C. should you decide to try it. :D
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3986528/posts?page=68#68
Wish I had bought MRNA stock though. Unbelievable chart.
This is the more invasive of the vaccines as it injects DNA into the cells to produce mRNA to then produce the spike proteins.
It is not a dichotomy where all of them are really caused by the jab or none of them are. There are always going to be cases where somebody happens to die from an unknown cause and something that did not really cause the death is blamed.
In typical years we have about half the country getting flu shots and about 150 total VAERs deaths reported. This year are on track to have about 100 times that.
Assuming half the population roughly is vaccinated by flu shots in a typical year we have about 166.5 million Americans vaccinated. With an average life span in US of about 78, we should thus expect about 5924 people that took a vaccine to die on any given day by pure coincidence not necessarily having anything to do with the vaccine. Now being that I *think* that just about all the deaths reported are during the first two days, let us say 120 of those reported in this case, then of the first two day reports we have about 120 out of 11,880 deaths reported as vaccine related in a typical year. So about 1% of the deaths blamed on the flu shot out of deaths in the two days following when a flu shot was gotten.
Now it is not unreasonable to suspect that the flu shots might not have caused any of these deaths. Its not hard to believe that 1% of deaths are cases where the real cause is not apparent and people go looking for other answers. I don't know if this is the case, maybe there are even more than 150 flu shot deaths in a typical year, but the point is as an upper bound for falsely blaming a vaccine in the previous 30 years of VAERs data we have 1% false blame the vaccine rating.
Of course for THIS year we have about 100 times more deaths reported. If we assumed for the heck of it that not a single one of these deaths was really due to the vaccines we would have to credit anti-vaxxer hysteria has convinced grieving families to falsely blame the vaccines for about 100% of the expected deaths in the two days following vaccination (which is still where the lions share of reported deaths fall).
Now a roughed over part of this quick analysis is that we may have older more feeble people taking the vaccine who were more likely to die anyway. But even so, we are dealing with half the population about being jabbed so we can't have just old people there. As an upper bound for the effect then, lets cut the 100% in half down to 50%.
Thus bending over backwards as much as possible on the side of the vaccines being just as safe as the flu shots, we are still left with a false blame rate of going from 1% to 50% of deaths in first two days...which is not very plausible even if VAERs is better know now and all.
Bottom line: It seems most of these reported deaths really are due to the jabs, and it seems these jabs are far more dangerous than flu shots in the short term.
As far as long term data, there is no data other than biologists who say its ok and some predicting disaster.
Dang!
Stay the hell away from pfizer! Wow that’s nuts
They can afford to improve the vaccine and make it safer. And I think there needs to be dialogue between Oxford-Astrazeneca (British/Swede) Sputnik (Russian) scientists who employ the same adenovirus technology. Russia’s Gamaleya Institute claims they use a fancy filtration system they can share knowledge about...
Actually starting yesterday I’m on the natural anti-covid protocol.
Ivermectin, C, D, Zinc, Quecertin. I will stay on it indefinitely.
Nice to hear that C might help.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.