To: Dr. Franklin
Since you aren't a CISSP and you didn't attend the event, you have no standing to object to anything Lindell did. Nor are you a competent witness to testify about anything that happened there. BTW, I haven't read anything supporting your assertions either. Unfortunately, that is intellectually dishonest. Whatever certifications a poster may or may not have is irrelevant.
Moreover, such declarations are an attempt to steer discussion away from the main points being discussed.
And my comments are based on what attendees are reporting and also by virtue of watching the Symposium. Also, Mike Lindell was no longer stating during the third day of the Symposium that cyber experts were reviewing packet captures provided to Lindell.
Name them.
Robert Graham
Harri Hursti
Bill Alderson
Well, again, Josh Merritt obviously attended the event and analyzed Pcaps. The fact that the corporate media isn't reporting on what actually happened, doesn't prove it didn't happen.
But media is reporting on what has happened. That it is not "corporate" media is not really relevant is it? Either the reporting is accurate or it is not. Here's some coverage from Wednesday:
https://www.dakotanewsnow.com/2021/08/12/cyber-expert-claims-mike-lindell-does-not-have-election-data-eligible-5-million-award/
35 posted on
08/13/2021 8:36:57 AM PDT by
Fury
To: Fury; Dave Wright
Unfortunately, that is intellectually dishonest. Whatever certifications a poster may or may not have is irrelevant.
So, you admit that you have no qualifications to render an expert opinion on the matter. Thanks!
Moreover, such declarations are an attempt to steer discussion away from the main points being discussed.
The point being discusses is the expert analysis of the 37 TB of data from the election, which you aren't qualified to discus...
And my comments are based on what attendees are reporting and also by virtue of watching the Symposium.
I watched much of the broadcast as well. However, the techs had break out sessions in another room, which wasn't broadcast live. Again, obviously, you weren't there.
Also, Mike Lindell was no longer stating during the third day of the Symposium that cyber experts were reviewing packet captures provided to Lindell.
That doesn't mean it didn't happen, or perhaps it had been completed by then?
Robert Graham Harri Hursti Bill Alderson
Hmmmm... and how many hundred attended? Did they actually attend the break out sessions, or where they there only for the free food? If this goes to court, it becomes a classic "battle of the experts". Obviously, Alderson is either incompetent or will serve as a paid expert for Joe and the Ho.
But media is reporting on what has happened. That it is not "corporate" media is not really relevant is it? Either the reporting is accurate or it is not. Here's some coverage from Wednesday:
https://www.dakotanewsnow.com/2021/08/12/cyber-expert-claims-mike-lindell-does-not-have-election-data-eligible-5-million-award/
Bias is always an issue. In this case the above link is from KSFY-TV, part of Gray Television, Inc., which is based in Atlanta, GA of all places. The establishment elite in Atlanta don't have a bias in your humble opinion? Simply hysterical!
36 posted on
08/13/2021 10:35:04 AM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: Fury; Dr. Franklin
I suppose more to your reply to me, I’d offer the following to Dr. Franklin to consider: (from someone who was there, and IS an expert in pcaps):
https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1426265467862327297?s=20
https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1426234536309018628?s=20
Live thread from Symposium (goes for 88 separate follow up tweets through all 3 days, in the end, despite what GP and Steve Bannon, and Lindell himself may claim, the PCAPS were NOT given for independent verification therefore no verification of Lindell’s claim, AT ALL):
https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1424878450867847181?s=20
Yes, apparently Rob Graham is part of the Deep State now. I wonder how “deep” it goes? < /sarc >
By the way, we (on FR) are all aware that “Q” is probably Ron Watkins right, of 8chan fame? Or at least he knows who “Q” is, and holds that identity “tight”, for security reasons dontcha know < /DRIPPING sarc >
SMH
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson