Replies

So far, no participant at the event seems to have been allowed to actually examine the files.

Obviously, you didn't read the story. Josh Merritt has plainly been able to review some file, and he doesn't disagree that the data he saw came from the 2020 election.

John Merritt was part of the staff of the symposium, not an invited outside participant. He was the one who told the outside participants that they would not be able to examine the files, lol.

Obviously, you didn't read the story. Josh Merritt has plainly been able to review some file, and he doesn't disagree that the data he saw came from the 2020 election.

But the portion of the Symposium that deal with the packet captures wasn’t for the benefit of Josh Merritt. It was for the CISSP (at a minimum) credentialed attendees that were there at the invitation of Mike Lindell to examine the packet captures that he claims showed the election results were changed.

So far, no participant at the event has stated anything was fake.

Come on now. Is that the right statement to make? At least two attendees stated they did not get to review any of the 2020 election packet captures.

Asked another way - are there any attendees that claim they viewed and analyzed packet captures from the 2020 election as discussed by Mike Lindell prior to the Symposium?