[Fury]

Obviously, you didn't read the story. Josh Merritt has plainly been able to review some file, and he doesn't disagree that the data he saw came from the 2020 election.

But the portion of the Symposium that deal with the packet captures wasn’t for the benefit of Josh Merritt. It was for the CISSP (at a minimum) credentialed attendees that were there at the invitation of Mike Lindell to examine the packet captures that he claims showed the election results were changed.

So far, no participant at the event has stated anything was fake.

Come on now. Is that the right statement to make? At least two attendees stated they did not get to review any of the 2020 election packet captures.

Asked another way - are there any attendees that claim they viewed and analyzed packet captures from the 2020 election as discussed by Mike Lindell prior to the Symposium?

[Dr. Franklin]

But the portion of the Symposium that deal with the packet captures wasn’t for the benefit of Josh Merritt. It was for the CISSP (at a minimum) credentialed attendees that were there at the invitation of Mike Lindell to examine the packet captures that he claims showed the election results were changed.

Since you aren't a CISSP and you didn't attend the event, you have no standing to object to anything Lindell did. Nor are you a competent witness to testify about anything that happened there. BTW, I haven't read anything supporting your assertions either.

Come on now. Is that the right statement to make?

Yes.

At least two attendees stated they did not get to review any of the 2020 election packet captures.

Name them.

Asked another way - are there any attendees that claim they viewed and analyzed packet captures from the 2020 election as discussed by Mike Lindell prior to the Symposium?

Well, again, Josh Merritt obviously attended the event and analyzed Pcaps. The fact that the corporate media isn't reporting on what actually happened, doesn't prove it didn't happen.