>>>The FDA will soon find that at least one of the vaccines is “safe and effective” (some say as soon as September 6) and then a lot of the arguments are gone.
Also, if your employer is a state or federal entity, there is no liability because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.<<<
That is true.....for now.
If terrible side effects result from the experimental jab, infertility, birth defects etc, even years from now, all that you wrote above will be swept aside, and the experimental mRNA jab-pushing principals will be hunted down and hanged.
[Images of thalidomide babies, for an example of what would cause such public rage.]
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=thalidomide+babies&t=chromentp&atb=v134-1&iax=images&ia=images
The Nazis never thought they’d lose the war and be held to account, but they were. Everything they did was “legal” under German law. Then came Nuremberg. They were hanged.
In these hypothetical future Nuremberg 2 trials, whistleblowers may likely come forward, (or testify under offer of immunity), that Pfizer and Moderna executives bribed CDC and FDA bureaucrats to obtain the EUA and later the FDA approval.
Bribery and corruption found at the start would undo all of the current immunity.
That’s why I consider it important to bring up the Nuremberg Code, as a reminder to the shot-callers pushing to make the experimental jab mandatory.
It’s not the black-letter laws TODAY in 2021 that will count. It’s the level of public outrage later, if the jab causes birth defects, etc.
Ask the Nazis about German law, during and after the war.
Bribery and corruption found at the start would undo all of the current immunity.
—
One can pretty well infer that occurred with the the very odd stance the CDC has taken on people who have recovered from Covid; acting as if naturally acquired immunity is not an established fact. Instead, claiming without evidence, that natural immunity is somehow not as good as that provided by the vaccines.
One has to ask why the push to “immunize” someone who is already immune. Two nefarious possibilities exist.
One is pure profit. They want *no* exemptions based on a simple blood test, to people getting the shot, because perhaps over half the US population already has natural immunity. Can’t go chopping those Pfizer profits in half, can we.
The second possibility is they know natural immunity is durable so they want to fold that population into the population receiving the vaccines to inflate the real-world effectiveness of the vaccine. This also voids any possibility of a control group of naturally immunized people to compare infection rates with.
I suspect, however, these best laid plans have already gone awry, unexpectedly. They didn’t take into account the possibility of ADE, and now we’re beginning to have comparison statistics between infection rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated. And when you look not at the aggregate numbers, but the recent infection stats, it’s showing the vaccines are ineffective. This is also a reason why they want to force the vaccine on everyone to destroy the unvaccinated as a control group.
Gteat points.
Also is anyone else looking into the fact that Gates Soros bought a testing (for CV-19) company and now, (conveniently), just months later, the government is calling for weekly tests for people?
This has to be the biggest scam/shakedown ever to be put on people by their government.
Corruption on a MASSIVE scale.
Great point!
Meanwhile, many many people claiming to be “in the know” like the MTv/Tik Tok star who was creeping around the White House the other day in a PSA are begging EVERYONE to get the jab because you know, the delta variant etc etc.
They will not suffer any consequences, though.