Bribery and corruption found at the start would undo all of the current immunity.
—
One can pretty well infer that occurred with the the very odd stance the CDC has taken on people who have recovered from Covid; acting as if naturally acquired immunity is not an established fact. Instead, claiming without evidence, that natural immunity is somehow not as good as that provided by the vaccines.
One has to ask why the push to “immunize” someone who is already immune. Two nefarious possibilities exist.
One is pure profit. They want *no* exemptions based on a simple blood test, to people getting the shot, because perhaps over half the US population already has natural immunity. Can’t go chopping those Pfizer profits in half, can we.
The second possibility is they know natural immunity is durable so they want to fold that population into the population receiving the vaccines to inflate the real-world effectiveness of the vaccine. This also voids any possibility of a control group of naturally immunized people to compare infection rates with.
I suspect, however, these best laid plans have already gone awry, unexpectedly. They didn’t take into account the possibility of ADE, and now we’re beginning to have comparison statistics between infection rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated. And when you look not at the aggregate numbers, but the recent infection stats, it’s showing the vaccines are ineffective. This is also a reason why they want to force the vaccine on everyone to destroy the unvaccinated as a control group.
Yes to all at 56. They are very worried. They should be.