A lot of things are referenced in medical malpractice trials. Which of those things are based on actual points of law? And even if this is true, then this line from your letter seems like it's verifiable B.S. anyway:
... implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
What "legal requirement" is this?
Anyone who is in a position like this needs to understand that you're not sending this letter to some anonymous jackass on the internet, or some random guy stocking shelves at Trader Joe's. The letter is going to end up in the hands of a corporate attorney who may read it and then advise the company to fire anyone who would put such a clear demonstration of his ignorance in writing.
The Nazis never thought they might lose the war and wind up being held to account, but they were.
Their defense was "just following orders" and "there are no laws in total war."
They were hanged anyway.
If dire birth defects, for example, result a few years from now, [think of Thalidomide], Fauci and Daszak could be hanged, regardless of the black-letter law in 2021.
[And there was no Nuremberg Code at the Nuremberg Trials. It came in 1947, out of the trials.]
.
They were hanged anyway.
If dire birth defects, for example, result a few years from now, [think of Thalidomide], Fauci and Daszak could be hanged, regardless of the black-letter law in 2021.
Since you are going ad hominem, I must ask you...
Why are you taking the side of the Nazis in pushing forced medical experimentation on unwitting innocent Americans?
Are you related to Dr. Mengele?
Are you profiting from the billions and billions being raked in by Big Pharma for their experimental synthetic mRNA spike protein jabs?