I said I’m not paranoid, I’m calm, rational, and laughing at your foolish hallucinations.
Now answer the question;
“can you produce any evidence that is consistent with the hypothesis that the vaccines are as safe as previous vaccines?”
dynoman: That is a very foolish argument. Trump liked Fauci and how did he turn out. Trump liked Barr and how did he turn out. And on and on.Unfortunately for you, spamming me about hallucinating is never going to change the truth.
Now answer the question;I did answer the question. The evidence is that the vaccines are safe.
“can you produce any evidence that is consistent with the hypothesis that the vaccines are as safe as previous vaccines?”
Comparison to “previous vaccines” is irrelevant. Examples can be found in either direction, but the comparisons / information are lacking controls and are heavily biased. Of greatest significance, IMJ, is that no previous vaccine been the subject of even remotely so large and intense an effort to monitor for problems, related or not, once public vaccinations were begun. (If you’d been to a mass vacc clinic, you’d know this.) That completely destroys any attempt at quantitative comparison.
That leaves non-comparative safety analysis, which the Hopkins article addresses. If you believe they, and the vast majority of the medical community, are liars, then just say it. If you are right, we have FAR greater problems than the worst the extreme anti-vaccers claim for the Covid vaccine.
What bothers me is that in this silliness, real problems and potential problems are not being addressed. Several days delayed after a 2nd shot rashes affecting much of one’s torso or even their entire body (my wife’s case) seem to be fairly common. My wife’s lasted only overnight, but some I have direct knowledge of lasted several days, and one fellow I am acquainted with had major coverage of shingles-like rashes that prevented him from interviewing for new employment for a month.