Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WildHighlander57; LittleLinda; grey_whiskers

Have unvaccinated folks who previously had covid and were later re-exposed, gotten a worse case/ADE ?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LL and GW’s replies about ADE left me with some questions, I’ll have to re-read and think.

But I am wondering about Wild’s question, esp in connection with what I’ve read, if a person had covid, it gives them immunity, not a worse case down the road like with dengue.


1,300 posted on 08/07/2021 10:56:56 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Nothing is more important than Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1210 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

That’s because of the specific antibodies invovled.
I lost the link but I read that those who had natural covid infections, made more antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein s than to the spike.
It might be (hint: someone should do studies on animal models but the probably can’t get funding and won’t be allowed to publish) that antibodies to nucleocapsid proteins do not lend themselves to ADE, but that antibodies to spike proteins do.


1,302 posted on 08/07/2021 11:04:05 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1300 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

That’s my impression too, lj. Natural infection limits re-infection possibilities, for sure, and likely the severity as well. Dr. Yeadon, former Pfizer VP, believes that any variants/samiants would have to be different by 50% or more for the immune system to not be able to recognize and fight it. That’s the nature of the human immune system, even after years/decades of dormant immunity. This was proven with the initial SARS breakout that started in 2002. Nineteen years later, those infected back then still mounted an immune response when exposed to a SARS virus that was up to 30% genetically different.

That reminds me of something he or another doctor said about human immunity. Doing an antibody test to try to gauge a person’s likely immune response is a poor way to determine their chance of disease if exposed again. He described that the presence of antibodies diminishes over time, like soldiers who have been reassigned or retired. But once the body detects the presence of the pathogen again, the immune “soldiers” immediately come out of retirement and jump-start the antibody defense again.

While there isn’t a high presence of antibodies in the patient forever, they can be quickly multiplied when required in a reasonably healthy individual. His point was that you can’t measure a person’s likelihood for disease from an antibody snapshot when the person hasn’t been re-exposed. This is important because there are ‘experts’ who claim that they tested the antibodies in prior covid and SARS patients and there was a low antibody count. These ‘experts’ claim this proves they’re unprotected and still need the vaccines. Dr. Yeadon refuted that without reservation or qualification, citing the body’s ability to quickly start making antibodies upon re-exposure.


1,312 posted on 08/07/2021 11:26:06 AM PDT by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson