Posted on 08/03/2021 1:55:30 PM PDT by ransomnote
Not I’m not !
Conversation over now its just sophistry.
The sophistry is not on my part.
And what evidence is incontrovertible? What entity is going to legally remove a sitting POTUS? The answer to both questions is NONE.
There are various reasons why the founders included the electoral college in the constitution. A states legislators can have the electors vote any way they choose, regardless of the popular vote. This alone chooses the president, a process that was completed in December, with no valid dissent.
It is over, but y’all hopium dealers are probably going to keep this nonsense up till 2024, aren’t you?
I never argued that the courts, the state legislators and then the electors would have the courage to do that right.
Don't put words in my mouth, you're not smart enough.
No, comparing an election to a stolen gun is the most non-sequitur argument I have seen on here.
Your brainworms are well fed. And if you think anything will happen to revert the POTUS to Trump, you are going to have a rough 3.5 years.
As I said I never argued that the courts, the state legislators and then the electors would have the courage to do that right. I have no expectation of that.
No, comparing an election to a stolen gun is the most non-sequitur argument I have seen on here.
Of course. The point was over your flat head.
“The Constitution says no government confiscation of guns. Period.
“So now you’re forgetting about the literal words in US Constitution?”
Those are not the literal words in US Constitution.
“AND there is no Constitutional right to posses a stolen office of the presidency”
Straw man - nobody has argued a Constitutional right to posses a stolen office of the presidency.
Straw man - nobody has argued a Constitutional right to posses a stolen office of the presidency.
A legitimate president has the constitutional right to the office of the presidency until he is removed by impeachment or the 25th amendment.
A fraud (as proved in a court of law) posing as a president has no such constitutional right.
The 4th amendment gives the government the power to seize the gun given a warrant from a judge and probable cause. Proven theft is probable cause.
-PJ
“A fraud (as proved in a court of law) posing as a president has no such constitutional right.”
Still just your straw man - nobody here has said or implied otherwise.
A fraud (as proved in a court of law) posing as a president has no such constitutional right.
Still just your straw man - nobody here has said or implied otherwise.
Strawman my foot. It was the original point of contention on this thread. But your agreement with my point is noted.
“It was the original point of contention on this thread.”
No, that’s just your functional illiteracy at work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.