Peter Jay Hotez, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine Houston, United States
Reading his argument, I invoke Godwin's Law.
My only response is: these hacks aren't "following the science", they're following the money. A forensic study of where the money is flowing would tell us an awful lot about what is the truth.
The other thing to be considered is if they are behaving like this, there really is something (in the form of deliberate deceit or other miscreant behaviour) to hide.
Babylon Bee?
It’s already a federal crime to abridge the constitutional right of freedom of speech, which would cover the freedom to criticize Fauci.
Professor Peter Hotez needs to familiarize himself with the constitution and the amendments to the constitution.
He might end up in jail himself.
These are blasphemy laws against their secular god - Fauci.
Good little communist.
Peter Jay Hotez, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine Houston, United States
Hate is a Motive, it isn’t a Crime.
We are living in an Episode of the Twilight Zone and the entire Government is Anthony.
Squaring the 1st Amendment with this call to “extend federal hate-crime protections” is not possible yet they continue to do so. UGLY!
IMHO, the true “hate crime” was NIH’s funding of “research” that aided and abetted the development of a virus that killed many thousands of people!
Never trust a grown man that wears bowties.
Hotez is the simp that wanted Texas to completely close for 6 weeks.
Which “scientists” or “doctors” get this protection?
Americans mask:
this monster studies tropical medicine where
HCQ is used widely, safely, and as BOTH
preventative and cure.
so FauXi’s removal of a therapy that works,
to promote his patented, royalty-bearing, Gain-of-Function,
weaponized common cold (mixes with nasty stuff like HIV)
is criminal, deserves both criticism and indictment,
and hopefully Justice for the more than 7000 murders.
Justice William Brennan famously wrote for the court in the celebrated libel law decision New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964):
Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide open and that it may well include vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
LOL. Had a good laugh for the day!
You will love Big Brother.
“far-right extremists,”
The problem is that so many on the left have moved so far to the left that anything not on the left looks far right.
Criticizing the government is a hate crime. OK. Good to know.
Odd that the interests of the CCP and the NIH seem to be perfectly aligned.
Stalin, Lenin and Hitler are blushing... even they didn't come up with this move this early in their 'hellhole' development plans...
Guys like him are trying to make being called smart an insult. He can’t be that smart as it seems he’s taken Orwell’s book “1984” as a challenge and not the warning it was meant to be.
I judge Fauci by his own constantly changing statements. If he ever comes to your house do not let him used your bathroom. He’ll get it everywhere but the toilet.