[BereanBrain]

Over 300 million years old but remarkably similar to current horseshoe crab brains. Another straw on the camels back of evolution.

[Fai Mao]

“Over 300 million years old but remarkably similar to current horseshoe crab brains. Another straw on the camels back of evolution.”

Not this time.

The horseshoe crab fossils can be found earlier than that. They are a very old species. They are not really crabs at all, more like shelled, sea spiders

I am not a naturalistic evolution guy and always like to twist the godless scientist nose, you can’t this time. Unlike the coelacanth, these are not index fossils.

[enumerated]

“Over 300 million years old but remarkably similar to current horseshoe crab brains. Another straw on the camels back of evolution.”

Fine, Darwin’s theory of natural selection is only a theory, and science may one day disprove it.

But that doesn’t make your superstitious belief in creationism any less far-fetched.

[alexander_busek]

Over 300 million years old but remarkably similar to current horseshoe crab brains. Another straw on the camels back of evolution.

Your remark is analogous to the hoary old "If we are descended from apes, why are there still apes?" objection.

Pitiful!

Regards,

[Sonshinegirl]

Point on