DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'

Stew Peters Show ^ | July 28 , 2021 | Karen Livingston

[norsky]

Rumble — EXCLUSIVE! Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, came forward with indisputable documentation that should be shared with the ENTIRE WORLD!

The inoculation being referred to as 'COVID Vaccines' is a poisonous death sentence, and nobody should subject themselves to the shots.

Karen also confirms that graphene oxide, hydrogel is in the shot, used for possible tracking patient.

DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'

[TTFX]

Hey, norsky. Where’d this new vax pimp come from?

---

They were disappointed in 2ProtectTheVax.

[bagster]

Funny you should mention 'the grassy knoll', since the term and over usage of it was put into effect by the CIA to tamp down any 'grassy knoll' theories. You can google that one.

The CIA term I was referring to is 'conspiracy theory', not 'grassy knoll'. Apologies for not making that clear with my sloppy writing. I know you're easily confused.

[bagster]

They were disappointed in 2ProtectTheVax.

Ahhh, so 2a got recalled to the bot factory for updates and they sent in the BT-2000 model. Okay.

[bagster]

Oh please. I can walk by a flag pole without being stuck to it. I haven’t grown a third arm. No blood clots.

Doesn't match the facts on the ground.

[norsky]

Hey, norsky. Where'd this new vax pimp come from? I hain't seen him haunting the Vax War threads before. All of a sudden he pops up like a bad pimple? What makes, droogy?

........

paid pimp

[CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC]

Well sorry to tell you, son. But it's obvious you weren't among my originally-intended audience.

I posted a long, fact-filled, well-thought-out argument, including math kept simple enough that even a grade-school dropout could follow :

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3980064/posts?page=213#213

It was intended for people who might be on the fence about the truth of the claim that: "Vaxes don't protect against ANYthing! See this Peer-Reviewed blahblah..."

I didn't expect any response from that group. I can only cross my fingers that facts and logic and simple math got through to some number of them, and they can now clearly see how they're being manipulated into visiting clickbait conspiracy links, via a statistic that has been cleverly twisted into a Big Lie.

By the positive responses I got, I know I was right on target.

And speaking of targets .... When the Cream of the Crap of Conspiracy Cretins pop up their pointy little heads to scream ad-hominems back at my long post, they make themselves targets too tempting for me to ignore. I gladly accomodate them by shifting into ultra-low gear == stooping down to their level to wrestle with them in their sties, getting glorious mud from their habitat all over myself.

And why not? By never mentioning any of the facts + stats + quotes I brought up, you have either chosen to completely ignore reasoning that destroys one of your favorite lies, or else you haven't the candle-power required to understand basic logic. Either case means it's pointless to attempt to engage with you on a rational level.

So yes, you can pat yourself on the back for finally realizing that I was employing "sarcasm"! (Wow, do ya think?)

Reasoned debate can be stimulating when it's with someone who is willing to concede some of your points, argue with others, and bring up new points supporting their contentions, and you do the same for them.
OTOH, it's only superficially and temporarily entertaining to wrestle with Porky or Petunia at their level, trading zing for zing, sarcasm for sarcasm, ad-hominem for ad-hominem.

And since that's all that's left of this discussion baggy, I bid you and norsky sayonara. I see you've already started playing with each other anyway, rolling around in it and gleefully squealing, so I trust you won't miss my presence. It looks like others are dropping out as well, holding their noses no doubt, so yet once again you can claim Victory! that you're the last ones still standing in your sty.

Over and Out.

[norsky]

And since that's all that's left of this discussion baggy, I bid you and norsky sayonara. I see you've already started playing with each other anyway, rolling around in it and gleefully squealing, so I trust you won't miss my presence. It looks like others are dropping out as well, holding their noses no doubt, so yet once again you can claim Victory! that you're the last ones still standing in your sty. Over and Out.

.............

Pity party pouting

[Steve Van Doorn]

Relative risk reduction was not mentioned in the covid studies which I posted to you. we've only been given Absolute Risk Reduction which as you said was 1%. The +95% absolute risk reduction was a fabrication (my word) again I posted a report explaining how it was derived.

We can't report on information that wasn't given.

You said again,
"They are around 90% effective" You have zero evidence to back that up.
I find it amazing they attacked the author of the lancet report when he is explaining data that is given. This attack on a good person with a valid argument only proves there is nefarious motives.

Please go back and read the original data I posted to YOU. Which I did back in January before you even heard of the this falsification of data claiming of 95% effective. it's not there.

Another reason your argument doesn't hold water. The study in question came out in December there is no way to evaluate protection at that point. WAY To early. it was the first phase of the test. The lancet was evaluating the second phase.

[bagster]

Well, that short story almost made novel length. I didn't mean to get you so excited.

Well sorry to tell you, son. But it's obvious you weren't among my originally-intended audience.

I'll break it down for ya, kid. You don't get to pick your audience when you spew your hateful and false rhetoric on a public forum, but wouldn't that be nice?

I can only cross my fingers that facts and logic and simple math got through to some number of them, and they can now clearly see how they're being manipulated into visiting clickbait conspiracy links, via a statistic that has been cleverly twisted into a Big Lie.

You're doing that opposite thing again. You know, the one where you take the other side's argument and flip it to make it your own. The BIG LIE happens to be the entire covid/vax hoax. That has been proven over and over again right here on FreeRepublic.com.

Not sure where you been, Mister recently arrived pimple, but your 'math and logic' have been shown to be the little lies that make up the BIG LIE. And you're full on board with it.

Interesting that such a clever boy should be so taken in. What shall we attribute that to? A willingness to align yourself with the 'smart' crowd? The fake news media, Big Pharma, CDC, WHO, NIH, Fauci and the bulk of the socialist medical 'community'?

And let'S not forget the fake Biden 'administration' and Sister Pelosi and crew. Yes, those are your people now, and they are happy for your assistance.

Or.....maybe you're just not as clever as you think you are?

When the Cream of the Crap of Conspiracy Cretins pop up their pointy little heads to scream ad-hominems back at my long post, they make themselves targets too tempting for me to ignore.

Oh noes. Not a TARGET!!!!

And why not? By never mentioning any of the facts + stats + quotes I brought up, you have either chosen to completely ignore reasoning that destroys one of your favorite lies, or else you haven't the candle-power required to understand basic logic. Either case means it's pointless to attempt to engage with you on a rational level.

Or, option #3. I've heard your entire shtick a bajillion times from various and other sundry vax pimps on FreeRepublic.com. You bring nothing new to the table, vax kid. Nothing but blind denial of the actual experts who are trying to get past the cement encasing your vaxxy head.

So yes, you can pat yourself on the back for finally realizing that I was employing "sarcasm"! (Wow, do ya think?).

There! You're doing it again!

Reasoned debate can be stimulating when it's with someone who is willing to concede some of your points, argue with others, and bring up new points supporting their contentions, and you do the same for them.

Sorry, I didn't log onto the internet to stroke your ego and 'concede some of your points'. Not when everything you say is laid upon a foundation of THE BIG LIE. There is no profit in entering into the Fake Covid Circus and dancing with the clowns (that would be you).,p> You probly should seek out a coven of vax pimps (there is a small cult here on FreeRepublic.com). They will be happy to be impressed by your rhetorical 'skills' and top of the line sarcasm.

so yet once again you can claim Victory!

Expect no less. This one was just mop up duty. I saw a new vax troll on the scene running amok so I thought I'd drop in and knock him down a peg or two. Your rhetorical tricks needed to be exposed.

[reasonisfaith]

The only post I made about graphene oxide was a question.

You seem to be afraid of that question.

[reasonisfaith]

If graphene oxide is so safe, then why are you afraid to provide those details?

[bagster]

The arm chair quarterbacks with a medical degree from google strike again.

The affirmative action internet 'doctor' who has a problem with the English language and simple logic strikes again.

[humblegunner]

I have no idea if it’s safe or not.
Never said it was and don’t particularly care.

[Jane Long]

It’s a bot.

Check it’s posting history.

You can’t.

[humblegunner]

Yo mama a bot.

[bagster]

I have no idea if it’s safe or not. Never said it was and don’t particularly care.

There you go again, Bumpkin. Not taking a stand yet opening your ck-holster.

Whad'd I tell ya 'bout that right there?

[bagster]

Yo mama's bot is yo mama.

Think about it.

[PIF]

tremble

[humblegunner]

There you go again, Bumpkin. Not taking a stand yet opening your ck-holster.

A stand?

For what?

I don't care if people get a shot or not, it's not my business.

I'm sure not going to being a hopping hysteric over stuff that
other people do and that I cant change. Waste of good hysterics, you ask me.

[bagster]

You're ALMOST correct! I'm a card-carrying member of the FR Troll Hunters Union.

After a careful perusal of our membership rolls, your name could not be discovered.

Impersonating a Troll Hunter is a Federal offense and is punishable by up to 10 years in Federal lockup and a 12 billionty dollar fine.