Replies

This is not a vaccine. The jab is an mRNA package in a nano lipid or fat envelope delivered to a cell. It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful spike protein.

Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission. That’s not what this is. Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission.

The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials because people would ask what other treatments there are. And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs as a vaccine.

Defining the narrative with the term vaccine is a sucker punch to open and free discourse. “Vaccine” throws the discussion into one of pro/con vaccine. The jab is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogenetic spike protein manufacturing site.

No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine. Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device (and bio-weapon), not a drug. The jab is not a living or biologic system, but rather a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.

Ahithophel :" This is not a vaccine. The jab is an mRNA package in a nano lipid or fat envelope delivered to a cell.
It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful spike protein."

"Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards.
A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission.
That’s not what this is.
Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission."

" The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials
because people would ask what other treatments there are.
And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs as a vaccine."

(My comment): You speak the truth, and are 'spot on'.
I have never seen this so called *vaccine* so concisely and accurately described and explained as stated in your post #14.
Now add on the commercialization($$) by Big Pharma, and the unceasingly and hyper coverage by the media,
and the politicization of 'the jab' by the government for control over the people and their 'rights',
and you will exactly find the predicament that we are currently facing.

We are currently ruled over by un-elected bureaucrats in governmental positions, and I believe that it is all foreplay theater of "The Great Reset".

From #14:

“No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine. Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device, not a drug.”

It’s not a vaccine because there’s no virus, dead or alive (weakened) in the jab, to trigger the person’s OWN IMMUNE SYSTEM TO NATURALLY CREATE ANTIBODIES to fight the virus.

The antibodies will stay to protect the person from more Covid infections and above all, no more jabs would be necessary, right?

When and how would the cells that unleashed the pathogen production stop the unwanted extra production? Or do you have another jab in mind just to stop that stupidly started crap?

Ahithophel, you may be 100% right here, I don’t have the knowledge to challenge. But you’re missing the larger point—WHATEVER it is you want to call it, they are injecting it into people and it is KILLING way too many. And they are covering up / attacking those who bring it up. We need to get THIS message out!