So perhaps the vaccine is the disease, part II.
So perhaps the vaccine is the disease, part II.
********************************************************************************
It could be. After all, it was based on a computer generated code uploaded by the Chinese in Jan. for PHARMA to develop a pathogenic stimulant for injection into the American Population.
And traditionally when new stuff comes around, the injections to the military are some of the first to be mandated.
Was it not a violation of Nat’l Security considerations to just accept the Chinese data? Shouldn’t we keep some of our military from the injection until we know more? After reading this, I would think so.
Biotechnology: Genetically Engineered Pathogens
https://media.defense.gov/2019/Apr/11/2002115517/-1/-1/0/53ALMOSARAMONO.PDF
It appears that the vaccine actually makes the recipients asymptomatic spreaders. They are sick - and don’t know it and spread the virus, and the delayed treatment itself, means that some of the treatments won’t be as effective, thereby increasing the need for hospitalization.
And The existing injections are worthless for building durable immunity since the data is that the nucleocapsid section, which the injections do not code, is where most of the pre-existing resistance against serious disease resides.
This study did what we should have done originally — they isolated a panel of 120 peptides that comprised roughly 10% of the entire virus, containing 57% and 1% of the nucleocapsid and spike proteins.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x.pdf
The more “matches” you have on a pre-existing basis the more-fully your immune system can recognize the virus and while you will get infected, IF those matches are among the nucleocapsid section you’re much more-likely to drive it off without serious consequence.
Among the “PRE” (not-infected) collection of samples all were prior to November of 2019 and thus presumed non-infected. Most in that group were from wildly before Covid-19 by as much as 10 years or more, so the cross-contamination percentage is going to be very low.
From the study:
“Of the SARS donors, 100% showed T cell responses to cross-reactive and/or specific ECs (HLA class I 86%, HLA-DR 100%; Fig. 5d,e), whereas 81% of PRE donors showed HLA class I (16%) and/or HLA-DR (77%) T cell responses to cross-reactive ECs (Fig. 5d).”