Posted on 07/24/2021 9:23:30 PM PDT by 11th_VA
Just got the following email from Shutterfly :
Dear ————,
We’re updating our Privacy Notice and Terms of Use, reflecting our ongoing commitment to be transparent about how we use your data and keep it safe.
We invite you to read our policies in full, but in summary, we updated our Privacy Notice to further explain: When we might share a user’s information with law enforcement or government agencies, for example, if use of our services indicates criminal activity or poses a danger to the safety of others.
How our face grouping feature automatically groups similar faces together when you upload photos of yourself, friends, family or others. We offer this feature to help you organize your photo collection and jumpstart your projects. For most Shutterfly users, this feature is currently enabled, but you may disable it at any time by going to My Photos, then My Photos Settings in the dropdown by your name. You will find the Face Grouping toggle switch in Image Preferences. We also updated our Terms of Use to explain how either of us may initiate an arbitration proceeding in the event of a dispute.
Keeping your data safe and maintaining transparency are important to us. These updates will take effect on July 23, 2021 and no further action is required by you. Your continued use of our websites and/or mobile applications acknowledges your acceptance of these updated terms. Thank you for being a Shutterfly customer!
So...if I post a picture to Shutterfly of an email from Jao Bai-din to Hunter Biden containing official government information but using a private email account in order to break the law...the Feds will get all over that?
Any third party always had the option to report something to law enforcement if they thought this fit their definition. Crimes have elements and those elements don’t depend on what people *think* the law means.
Their definition is irrelevant. Crimes have elements.
Not any more, not here in America. See my tagline.
Face recognition software is irrelevant to the “share with police clause.” The moron class is unable to see the lack of relevance, but those two things have nothing to do with each other.
Copyright is also irrelevant.
Nope. The FBI is now a complete Stasi-like political henchmen organization.
I don’t care what your tag line says, crimes have elements. Either the elements are proven or they are not.
Ok, if you actually believe that, then why aren’t you doing something about it?
Regardless, it’s irrelevant.
Not true at all any more. I don’t care what your post says. See how 2 can play this ridiculous humpty-dumpty game of yours?
Well, now the FBI plays that game and they rely on rubes to keep the game going.
It would be fine if that is all they shared with them.
Welcome to the brave new world.
I am doing things about it. And I’m busy trying to show the light to those who prefer darkness and want to keep their old naieve viewpoints.
When the NAZIs were in power, they had only about 120 people to cover the city of Nuremburg, which was over a million people. The way they kept them in line was by encouraging snitches and neighbor-on-neighbor spying on eachother.
Our current fedguv has even more power than the NAZIs did, and they are using it. Of course, it all takes place with the cooperation of people like you.
And you tell them, COME BACK WITH A WARRENT.
Ok, if you actually believe that, then why aren’t you doing something about it?
Regardless, it’s irrelevant.
Asked & answered.
You didn’t answer anything. If you actually believed that we were under Nazi rule, and then were actually “doing something”, you wouldn’t be whining on a message board.
The latter doesn’t count as “doing something.”
What I’m doing above the watet doesn’t meet your approval. How surprising /s.
Maybe I should take bootlicking classes from you.
LOL, the Framers threw tea in the ocean. Let me know when you get to that point. K? Thanks.
You think this pre-civil war stuff is LOLfunny?
You’re further down the bootlicking statist path than I thought.
No, I think YOU are funny.
Your bluster doesn’t match your action.
Like I said, when you get to throwing the tea in the harbor, we can talk then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.