Translation: "I'm getting tired of hearing the truth".
Posted on 07/23/2021 3:37:34 PM PDT by ransomnote
They basically concluded this: 50% of fatalities following vaccination occur within 48 hours of injection. 80% occur within one week
1. The first would be the temporal relationships, so I told you, in time, it's really closely related to the injection.
semimojo wrote:
If the doctor understands VAERS I'm a little surprised he doesn't see the fallacy in this temporal relationship line of thought.
ransomnote: He's not quoting fallacy, he's quoting traditional tenets used to determine causality. It's so basic, so obvious. You know, one dog sees another eat from a dish and keel over and no longer wants to eat from the same dish.
semimojo wrote: Since VAERS is all based on self-reporting and not on ongoing surveillance it's a given you'll see more events reported close to the vaccination date.
ransomnote: But it's not a given that this will occur to a bizarre degree for the first time and only for Covid 'vaccines'. 500 million vaccines total injected per year averaging around 150 - 200 deaths. Covid 'vaccines' come along and we had 20 times that number for the first 26 million 'doses'. The numbers continue to climb beyond all imaginings and we're only at 7 months now.
If VAERS Data is, as you say, entirely based on 'self reporting', can we assume people paralyzed, dead or stroked/incapacitated reported soon after the event rather than later? Just curious.
semimojo wrote: It's simple human nature. If some medical issue arises you'll be much more likely to connect it with a shot you got yesterday than a shot you got 10 days ago.
ransomnote wrote: Read post #1 wherein his qualifications pound your silly ponderings into the dust with credentials, experience and success.
You are asserting it's self reporting - in many cases it's medical facilities, but often doctors don't have time to report it so it goes entirely unreported. Check the dates on the reports.
Your assertions are baseless. There's no way to explain away the fact that all other vaccines do not have this catastrophic die off either in 2 days after injection or in sheer numbers (thousands) of deaths. Medical facilities often report these deaths when they get around to it, it's not people breathelessly retelling the tale of their ER visit. That's what V-Safe is for. The CDC created a phone app called V-safe to capture and keep confidential as many reports of harm as possible directly from those who experience it in order to shield it from public view and deny harm.
semimojo: The only way this analysis has validity is if you actively monitor people getting the vaccine and consistently document issues, and then compare those numbers against a control group that didn't get the vaccine.
ransomnote: No. That's patently false. You're describing trial data. It's been done and falsified.
Now we're in administration of toxic 'vaccines'. There's normally a data review board monitoring administration, but the CDC did away with such traditions and announces secret meetings after the fact, with annonymous doctors, all of whom insist that not one of thousands of Covid vaccine deaths are at all related. None can be quoted or cited - for some reason we're not to know who has rendered these judgements.
Dr. McCullough is vastly more qualified than you are, and more qualified than Dr. Fauci, so I find it unintentionally humorous that you start with 'if the doctor understands VAERS' and then your ridiculous assertions that he did it all wrong, it's just the excitement of getting to report vaccine harm etc. Yours is complete distortion and fabrication. It's what you do.
I can't help but note you didn't say a word to address my criticism.
People, including doctors, are much more likely to connect a particular medical event to a shot the closer in time it occurred to that shot.
Is that observation in any way controversial?
I am getting tired of bad bad people who, apparently, force you to read the articles.
People, including doctors, are much more likely to connect a particular medical event to a shot the closer in time it occurred to that shot.
Is that observation in any way controversial?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
You’re indifferent to data collect tenets which hold proximity to event is relevant. WHen people collapse of anaphylaxis, the primary question is ‘what just happened to trigger this?’ The same principle is time tested and valued by physicians. You’d like to rewrite analysis used by researchers but fail.
I addressed your thesis by pointing out that had proximity to reporting been irrelevant to analysis but isntead an artifact of ‘human nature’ than it would hold true for the other 30 years of data collected in VAERS. Since Covid vaccines are the only ones displaying freakish patterns of excesses not matched by appox. 70 other vaccines in VAERS, your thesis fails for lack of evidence.
I can’t help but note that I said words about your criticism and you ignored them and continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are. Note that he was citing research by two others as part of his own opinion. Evidenced based research versus your assertions of superior reasoning? Yours is not the winning opinion.
Not self reported "data collection tenets".
...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.
Is it possible for you to lie more blatantly?
Is it possible for you to lie more blatantly?
~~~~~~~~~~
You get petulant when I expose your reasoning but there’s no other way to answer your questions. Dr. McCullough expresses the merits of the analyses of his work and others - you come along and say their analyses is by definition flawed and unreasonable. Oh well, I’m not responsible for your emotional reactions.
No surprise.
You don’t take responsibility for anything. Especially your misrepresentations to other FReepers.
Oh well, I’m not responsible for your emotional reactions.
No surprise.
You don’t take responsibility for anything. Especially your misrepresentations to other FReepers.
****************************************************************************************
Bull Crap. Ransomnote NEVER misrepresents anything.
ransomenote misrepresented my comment not 30 minutes ago.
“...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.”
I never asserted any such thing and neither you nor ransomnote can show where I did.
Want to reconsider your statement?
Ransomnote NEVER misrepresents anything.
ransomenote misrepresented my comment not 30 minutes ago.
“...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.”
I never asserted any such thing and neither you nor ransomnote can show where I did.
Want to reconsider your statement?
**********************************************************************************
Nope. Taking all the garbage you posted under consideration, I’d say that is an understatement of your self - inflated ego and your denigration of the Dr.
She made a logical conclusion based on the crap you posted.
The CDC is ...finally removing Emergency Use Authorization from PCR as a “diagnostic” for COVID.
a) they can’t defend the lie any longer?
b) they no longer need the hysteria and they’re preparing something else?
The CDC is ...finally removing Emergency Use Authorization from PCR as a “diagnostic” for COVID.
a) they can’t defend the lie any longer?
b) they no longer need the hysteria and they’re preparing something else?
**********************************************************************************
I pick both. They are not really mutually exclusive. Ha.
Translation: "I'm getting tired of hearing the truth".
Which is exactly why many people remain ignorant, indoctrinated rabbits.
Translation (from rabbit to human):
VAERS means absolutely nothing. Look away, citizen, look away. No conclusions can be reached or even estimated by VAERS data. It is a waste of time and money to even have a VAERS system.
Just listen to MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Signed,
A rabbit.
Haha. You want mommy to take responsibility for your emotional outbursts.
What a child.
Semiliterate:
ransomenote misrepresented my comment not 30 minutes ago.
Semicoherent quoting Ransomnote:
“...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.”
Semiretarded:
I never asserted any such thing and neither you nor ransomnote can show where I did. Want to reconsider your statement?
Okay, let'g break down just ONE of your comments.
If the doctor understands VAERS I'm a little surprised he doesn't see the fallacy in this temporal relationship line of thought.
According to this statement of yours, 'the doctor' doesn't understand VAERS (like you do) and he spouts fallacies through flawed analysis. But here you come along to set him straight.
If you can't even understand the things you yourself say, how you gonna analyze VAERS data. Or anything, for that matter.
#TheRabbitShuffle
👍🙋♀️Ha.
I don’t know how we can prevent another election theft. What do you suggest?
What’s the purpose of the Facebook source? Why do we want the website owners to think people are coming there from Facebook?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.