That’s not enough to determine the population distribution. The densities are averages.
You assume everyone reports the data the same. The is ZERO SCIENCE behind lockdowns. That is what should matter, not your interpretation of cherry picking flawed data comparing fractions of 1%. If you think what you’re doing is scientific then you don’t know what real science is.
The fact is that you’re fine with lockdowns without SCIENCE. You’re fine with endless violations of peoples’ rights. You obviously have no concerns about that.
So why are you here? It seems DU would be more your kind of place.
All we have seen is a playing out of Farr’s law.
“... A law formulated by Dr. William Farr when he made the observation that epidemic events rise and fall in a roughly symmetrical pattern. The time-evolution behavior could be captured by a single mathematical formula that could be approximated by a bell-shaped curve. ...”
If you lockdown, you depress the bell shaped curve but you extend the time line of the epidemic. (You will likely have multiple “humps” which we have seen.) The area under the curve number of cases (even deaths) doesn’t change. It continues until “herd immunity” is reached. Vaccines will increase the “herd immunity” condition but the shape of the curve doesn’t change.
This is all well known only Sweden acted like they understood it.
Sweden, Denmark and Norway report the data the same.
There is complete science behind the comparison of Swede and Norway Denmark.
In fact the comparison shows that lockdowns worked