Hannity’s nothing more than an entertainer. I would not take his advice on anything.
Except he’s insufferably difficult to listen to. How can he be seen as entertaining?
“ Hannity’s nothing more than an entertainer. I would not take his advice on anything.”
—————————————————————————-
I understand your point, I get it.
However the list of Entertainers in our Conservative circles is vast.
President Reagan……….actor
President Trump………..had a T.V. Show.
Rush Limbaugh…….Greatest Radio Host ever.
Mark Levin………..Radio Host, T.V. Show, formerly worked in the Reagan Admin. Lawyer.
Fred Thompson………..actor
Shirley Temple………actress, Ambassador to the U.N.
There are more………..
Hannity got ridiculously wealthy by knowing exactly what red meat to throw out there.
His style is simplistic because he is playing to the lowest common denominator.
He uses repetitious phrases, and illiteration: “media mob,” “cornhusker kickback,” and some key red meat words: “radical agenda”, “socialism” - phrases that the GOPe also interject into their statements to appease the crowd. (When these GOPe guys give statements, it sounds like word salad using certain words, but they carefully avoid any specific promise of action, and never back them up.)
This is more about appealling to and PLACATING conservatives, rather than inspiring and motivating them. Linseed Grahamcracker is an example of this tactic brought to an extreme.