[Olog-hai]

False. Crime is crime, and when the states commit crime against the federal government, the federal government does have the power to stop it; that is not enforcement of state laws.

---

If a state legislature in a state where the legislature already knew the election process was illegal didn’t take action before December 14^th to correct the fiasco, then the illegal election results would stand

---

That makes no sense whatsoever. Particularly in light of the Guarantee Clause of Article 4 Section 4, which not only guarantees a “republican form of government” rather than a rogue, totalitarian one—but also guarantees protection against “domestic violence”, and something as serious as fraudulent electoral certificates qualifies as that.

[Alberta's Child]

Particularly in light of the Guarantee Clause of Article 4 Section 4, which not only guarantees a “republican form of government” rather than a rogue, totalitarian one ...

Strange as it may seem, in the U.S. Constitution there is no requirement for states to let voters participate in a presidential election. At least 7 of the original 13 states chose their electors through some method other than a popular election, such as having the electors selected by the legislature or appointed by the governor.

The Constitution isn't kidding when it says: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors (etc.) ..."