[Alberta's Child]

Has this guy even read the U.S. Constitution? It doesn’t say a whole lot about presidential elections, but it is absolutely clear and equivocal that all presidential electors must be chosen on the same day.

If the Arizona legislature wants to come out and officially state that their electoral votes were cast fraudulently, then nothing should stop them. But that isn’t going to change the results of the 2020 election even if every state did the same thing.

[New Perspective]

Has this guy even read the U.S. Constitution?

"legal scholar John Eastman"

Yes dipchit, I would say he has.

[stanne]

John C. Eastman is an American legal scholar who is a former tenured professor of law and former dean at the Chapman University School of Law.[1] A former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, he is the founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence

[rdcbn1]

John Eastman is one of the most respected and knowledgeable constitutional scholars in America.

He may be the top guy in the country

[The MAGA-Deplorian]

Has this guy even read the U.S. Constitution? It doesn’t say a whole lot about presidential elections, but it is absolutely clear and equivocal that all presidential electors must be chosen on the same day.

Does that include certifying under the guise of fraud? The assumption is that this is not certified illegally. Somehow though certifying an election though is a crime. So we'll see if the all prefer prison, because if they don't null and void thier election, they all are politically toast, and each of them will potentially face lawsuits for violation of the 2018 Arizona Voters Rights Act.

Of course this still will depend on the results of the audit outcome. Wait and see on that, but as a side note SCOTUS has already ruled that fraud vitiates everything in US vs. Throckmorton This is fraud, so lets see SCOTUS attempt to ignore this.

[Bellagio]

"... but it is absolutely clear and equivocal that all presidential electors must be chosen on the same day."

Clear and equivocal??

What does that mean? Equivocal means unclear and doubtful.

Are you confused? And have you actually read it??

There is NO such 'same day' requirement. Post the amendment that you believe addresses 'same day' requirement in choosing electors.

Doesn't exists. A States legislature has plenary power in appointing electors. And they can appoint them, nullify them and replace them all the way up to the day they are counted in joint session of congress by the VP.

Article II Sec 1 clause 2

Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.

[AZJeep]

Actually, Arizona Republican electors voted for Trump in the same day. Just to take care about this! So were Republican electors in Nevada, and many more states I cannot recall now.
Somebody can decide which ones count.