Posted on 07/19/2021 10:27:55 AM PDT by bitt
Attorney and legal scholar John Eastman joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning.
Steve and John Eastman discussed Arizona Senate President Karen Fann’s OAN interview over the weekend. Fann suggested that the Arizona Senate does not have the authority to replace the electors in the state of Arizona.
Eastmen told Steve Bannon: “We can point to Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a state has had an election and has failed to make a choice on the day that was prescribed by law, meaning the choice that was made, the assumption is it was fraudulently given because of the illegal votes, the electors can be made on a subsequent date in such manner as the legislature in some state may direct.”
But there is a lot of work to be done before this could ever happen.
a corrupted election essentially means the country is not governed.
We the People create the government by means of our votes through the elections process. When both the elections process is corrupted, as well as the voting process, ONLY WE THE PEOPLE can correct that. There IS NO government entity that can do so
A state can replace its electors if it wants to, but that doesn’t mean that they can revote. Even if they could revote, that doesn’t mean that the U.S. Congress has to certify it.
What if the Rust Belt states that voted for Trump in 2016 decided in 2018 to replace their electors? Would you cry foul?
Unicorns. Unicorns aplenty. Sigh...
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
Fraud or not, the election will not be reversed. There is simply no provision in the Constitution for removing a President, once his term begins, apart from impeachment or the 25th Amend. Everything else is pure fantasy.
Our time is better spent developing rock solid proof of fraud that is so strong that no person can in good faith discount, even dummies. And to make that happen, we need to see criminal prosecutions of the fraudsters.
Such a penalty to assure that fraud won’t be overturned?!?
Just the latest nonsense and misinformation from the Hofts.
The Electors of a past election have already been sent they have voted. That is over and in the past. Nothing that can done about that now.
I’m not thrilled that we have to constantly lick joe machin’s backside and pray to baby jesus that chuck schumer doesn’t have pictures of him doing bad stuff behind a dumpster.
this is the universe you have created; we’re joe manchin’s b*tch.
oh, joy. this is much better than mildly annoying republicans. I mean, everyone’s individual liberty hanging in the balance of whether joe manchin is cranky pants on any given day is the most fantastic thing imaginable.
thank you so much.
Plenary powers. Look it up. It's extra-judicial, extra-executive, solely legislative between states' legislatures and Congress. We're well past 'certified'. We're into UNLAWFUL according to applicable state law. But there should be only removal, no replacement. The states that can't run lawful elections don't get represented in Congress until they can pass an audit after the next election (my suggested ruling of Congress).
Don’t tempt me with a good time.
(for the record, sarcasm)
Actually, Arizona Republican electors voted for Trump in the same day. Just to take care about this! So were Republican electors in Nevada, and many more states I cannot recall now.
Somebody can decide which ones count.
Bears repeating.
Kind of like the way we have all kinds of infringement on gun rights when the amendment is perfectly clear we should not?
Like it or not, the USCONT has no provision for declaring a certified election null.
None.
No standing.
States do, and have at times, but there were elections more messed up than this, like the 1876 one, where it was ruled once the electors vote, it is done.
Thing about it. Otherwise every US Presidential election going forward will be contested and overthrown in court. You will make the SCOTUS kingmakers.
No — the penalty is for letting fraudulent electors be certified in the first place.
It’s actually because of your insistence that we have to keep re-electing Grahamnesty types that Chuck Schumer does have pictures of that put us in this mess.
To me it doesn’t seem to be any more relevant then the previous one. This is about land fraud, not about elections. It’s quite a leap to go from land fraud to invalidating a presidential election. I can see it perhaps being used as part of an arguement to impeach Biden and convict him in the Senate. Even then it would be a weak argument you would have to use it as part of a case to prove Biden knowingly authorized the fraud. Good luck with that ! I don’t think Biden is capable of knowingly authorizing his evening meal !
The state legislature blew it. We have to live with that but make sure it doesn’t happen again. Replace all those all time servers particulalry the GOP seat warmers with people who actually care about the Constitution and the duties of a state legislature to that Constitution. Appeals to magical solutions because they make us feel better are a waste of time.
Wrong, as usual. Just look at the Congressional treatment of the Confederate states after the Civil War. They lost their representation for a period. Unlawful election as a state not within the Union.
In any event, figure out if you should be calling your US Senators and telling them to clean out their desks!
Right On!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.