“...who are popular with their audience with accurate information...”
That’s a crap shoot. So if a animal waddles, and swims in water, then it is automatically a duck and knows the truth about all other ducks. So do hippos, except for the knowledgeable part. And a liar will gladly accept money for lying. They therefore are going to hire hippos or ducks to prove their points.
“We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook...”
I doubt Facebook asked them to. And if they are, they are violating the first amendment, besides doing an illegal investigation of those that are commenting.
There’s more, but it gets redundant.
wy69
Freedom of speech and association issues