I didn’t see those particular studies so thank you. I’m aware that studies conducted in G7 countries have been as deeply flawed as the IVERCOR-COVID-19 trial. The people in charge of the studies have obviously been given instructions, probably by big pharma, to conduct them in such a way as to guarantee failure and ensure that ivermectin never becomes an approved treatment. They accomplish this by using test subjects less likely to respond to treatment and then using clinically insignificant dosing guidelines.
Jab-takeup and promotion is a priority and nothing can get in the way of continuing its emergency use authorization. A proven very cheap and effective alternative would certainly jeopardize the jab EUA so authorized trials are deliberately designed for failure. It’s clear to me that the doctors conducting the studies are being coerced because they added the qualifier “The mean dose of ivermectin was 192.37 μg/kg/day which was below the dose proposed as probably being effective.” They know the trial is rigged but are being forced to make it fail, likely threatened with loss of livelihood. The best they can do is report their results and insert the caveat.
I’ve been reading about the significantly more illustrative, effective and truthful results of widespread ivermectin use in India and Mexico following their early vaccination efforts. Covid exploded after they pulled the ivermectin prophylaxis and started vaccinating, and their medical communities were unable to handle all the emergencies. They had their instructions from WHO to their leadership to discontinue ivermectin use, but their reality was too much to handle so they re-introduced it, at least temporarily. Hospitals emptied and people recovered. Reports of their success with ivermectin were squelched but that cat was already out of the bag because people like Dr. McCullough and the Frontline Doctors were talking about it.
I mentioned it before and will say again that we’re watching a heavily-rigged shell game and the stakes are human lives. The criminality and breach of ethics is breathtaking. These last 18 months have been eye-opening for me because I had no idea how deeply big pharma had infiltrated and corrupted the medical industry, from the FDA, to medical schools, to physician associations, to research, all the way down to the individual family practice. Q was right when he said this is bigger than we knew and I also understand now why this needed to play out as it did. I’d have been a bit skeptical of big pharma’s evil intent and complete control had I not witnessed it myself these last 18 months. Okay Q, we get it now. Can we end the Show and Tell and clean it all up now?
I’m going to read the links you posted. Thank you.
The dose we've always talked about is 0.2mg/kg, which works out to 200 μg/kg, which is practically the same as 192.37. The key word is "mean", however. The same mean value could by achieved either by giving everyone 192.37/day, or by having 9 studies giving 1.0/day and one study giving 2000/day. The 9 studies would fail, and only the tenth would succeed.
Do you know the recommended frequency of taking ivermectin prophylacticly (sp?)? Once a week, once a year? Thanks.