So if you respect peer review then you should respect the outcome of peer reviews……….like in the case of this Thread’s article.
Hence why is was withdrawn…….it failed the peer review process.
Or are you gonna do as many seem to do around here lately, except the information you like, condemn or ignore the information you don’t like?
#DoubleStandards
No, I don’t respect peer review.
It has become corrupted long before the coof.
On both ends: crap being promoted and inconvenient work suppressed.
For example, the superstar Harvard cardiologist who got nailed when someone finally noticed, that according to a table in one of his papers, one of his patients became a father at age 7.
Vs. the Ivermectin paper did not make peer review because of concerns with plagiarism in the *Introduction*. Did anyone find systematic errors in the experimental design, or how it was carried out? Was the data shown to be falsified?