You don’t say.
Don’t care. Even removing Elgazzar, which they’ve already done, makes little difference in the meta study. Big Media depends on Big Pharma and lies for them. Big Pharma isn’t interested in an off-patent cheap therapeutic becoming known.
did you read this sentence
“If you remove this one study from the scientific literature, suddenly there are very few positive randomised control trials of ivermectin for Covid-19. Indeed, if you get rid of just this research, most meta-analyses that have found positive results would have their conclusions entirely
Any working therapy eliminates the Emergency Use Authorization. Hundreds of billions of dollars in extra profits would have been lost. So, they have to knock down every alternative.
Money for Big Pharma, Power for the Politians, an Economic Boon for China, Only HCQ and IVM stood in their way, so they had to destroy them.
There has been at least 18 months to determine a standard of care to treat this coof. It is criminal that there still is not one-apparently due to the need to keep the EUA active. The idea that we simply don’t give treatment till people are so bad they can’t breathe is inhumane and criminal. Thank God for doctors that at least try to help their patients.
Meanwhile, this study pretty much details why the current Vax is ill-advised:
publication date, January 2021. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x.pdf
Summary of key points analysis by Karl Denninger:
The entire reason for the demand for mass-vaccination relied on a lie; that this was a “novel” virus to which nobody had existing resistance.
That’s false; 81% of the population does have existing immunity. That immunity is strengthened, materially so, by natural infection.
From a public health perspective you want those people who are not going to be seriously harmed to get it naturally, not take a shot because it is that perfection of immunity that stops the disease from being of harm to the public on a durable basis.
The existing vaccines are worthless for building said perfected immunity since the data is that the nucleocapsid section, which the vaccines do not code, is where most of the pre-existing resistance against serious disease resides.
we do not even know if the nucleocapsid portion of the virus, inactivated, is pathogenic.
It very well might not be and had we produced inactivated vaccines via that route without the spike protein being present they would likely have a similar risk profile to the seasonal flu shot.
Instead - they are 100 or more times as dangerous. At the same time, the inactivated vaccine would have provided durable protection that all of the current shots do not because they omit said nucleocapsid sequences on purpose.
To continue said activity in the face of science documenting that you did it wrong goes beyond the realm of stupid and into the realm of criminal culpability for which no immunity should be recognized by anyone, ever, period.
Young people particularly should not get the Vax. The future of the world in terms of public health in fact requires that they be allowed to develop said natural, perfected immunity.
Preventing that by giving them a shot is felonious and anyone involved in it should be indicted, prosecuted and lose their life as the mass-murderers they will prove to be.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242205