It’s alarming how far people will go to defend a study withdrawn because of plagiarism in order to keep a narrative alive. Part of reasoning is not getting so married to an idea that one cannot deal with having that idea obliterated. Thank you for posting this most important article When the majority of data dies on the hill of being discredited it follows that we must not let people die because we have to believe that the reality is a conspiracy instead of the truth. Discernment is simple. But it is not easy as we are seeing by some of these posts.
Thanks again for posting this.
Link to where anyone here is defending the withdrawn study?
I will wait patiently.
Does plagiarism invalidate the clinical results?