“ In other words, you know the opposition to Ivermectin is a scam, and you’re good with the scam.”
———————————————————————————
Instead of “other words” I’d like to use my own words:
My information that I agree with is that Ivermectin is effective for very early mild cases of Covid-19.
Beyond that, continuing to rely on it as the user becomes sicker with more moderate symptoms can be a risk.
Ivermectin has failed with seriously ill patients.
I would like to see (perhaps one day) a good verified in-depth report regarding Ivermectin.
There is plenty of Data at this point with real patient use information.
So far, most information collected have been dubious or on a case by case occurrence.
I’m going to assume a top Medical School will be up to the task this Fall.
Let’s hope so.
(Raises eyebrow doubtfully)
Could the issue be conflating SARS-CoV-2 with COVID-X. The CPC was very good with this slight of hand. I feel most here are aware that Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, etc., are only/mostly useful in inhibiting the virus or reducing viral load. Dr. P. Kory may bring up IVM has some ACE-2 neutralizing affect (above .400-.500mg/Kg dose), but the emphasis is on the virus. The MATH+ protocols tend to slide over to the disease, COVID, but a true, real safe vaccine may be the overarching answer. Possibly everyone contributing to this discussion is correct - some see the head of the elephant some see the tail (virus vs disease).