Vaccines do not go into the bloodstream. Both the Moderna and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are an mRNA vaccine. The mRNA is taken up by the muscle cells, and the muscle cells use the information in the mRNA to start making a COVID-19 protein.
Posted on 07/14/2021 7:03:02 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Thanks for the ping — this was extensively discussed in an earlier thread. The theory this physician promulgates is full of holes, but I am sure the usual donnybrook will ensue.
Hope you have a great evening!
My gut didn’t tell me diddly daddly. I got the Pfizer shot. Given all the VAERS reports, I don’t plan on getting any boosters. I feel fine so far, but if this Doc’s prediction somehow turns out to be true, I guess it’s been nice to know you.
Optimal word is “eventually” .... not next year,
Yep. Guess what the body does in destroying the spikes attached to the endothelium?
What if it damages the cells in the endothelium in the process?
Does it notice the damage and try to fix that (scarring) ?
The other problem is that Pfizer is pushing for boosters after 6 months.
By definition, if you get a booster your body doesn’t recognize the spike protein.
So you repeat the process of flooding all the tissues in the body with *more* spike protein. Ad infinitum
The doctor also talks about 62% of the patients having both elevated D-dimer, and reduced exercise tolerance, e.g. the patient you used to walk 2 miles each way to seem him every week, but who now cannot walk more than 1/4 mile.
He attributes this to microclotting in the vasculature of the lungs, which he he says has the result of raising the blood pressure in the lungs, and which will do nasty things to the heart over time.
God will take you, but he has given us free will if you are murdered and a believer yes you go to his keeping but he didn’t send you the person that murdered you did and be assured the Lord will hold them to account their act.
Vaccines do not go into the bloodstream. Both the Moderna and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are an mRNA vaccine. The mRNA is taken up by the muscle cells, and the muscle cells use the information in the mRNA to start making a COVID-19 protein.
GrandJediMasterYoda, your contribution to Freerepublic would be very valuable to people on the fence about these vaccines. We will be praying for you. But We are all very interested as to what is happening with your body. You should start a Freerepublic Blog and chronicle this experience. We can give feedback and thoughts. Perhaps turn it into a book. People on both sides of the vaccine debate will weigh in. Whatever happens, you could help a lot of people!
Vaccines do not go into the bloodstream. Both the Moderna and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are an mRNA vaccine. The mRNA is taken up by the muscle cells, and the muscle cells use the information in the mRNA to start making a COVID-19 protein.
Distribution studies showed that it goes to many organs.
How do you know whether it stays in the arm or goes to other organs? By doing distribution studies.
The damage by blood clots is not necessarily reparable. Ask my heart and brain.
You are the last person I would ask for advice. Informed people find out everything they can before having mystery poisons injected into them that could affect their long term health.
Yes, but I don’t go to Flat Earther websites to find out the “truth” before getting on an airplane. If I’m concerned about the safety of flying, I’m looking at the safety record of the airline and the planes they’re using. I’m not worried about some random kook who claims the plane is going to fall off the edge of the Earth into the sun.
Informed people do real research. They don’t listen to nutjobs spouting nonsense as if it’s useful information.
You are the last person I would ask for advice.
If you want to ask 2AProtectTheVax something, just ask me. I will look at what Pfizer and Fauci would say, and then I will give you his answer.
They don’t listen to nutjobs spouting nonsense as if it’s useful information.
If taking a vaccine increases a clotting marker, that’s information worth considering.
Who will still vote democrat for many more years.
Women kept coming up to him and asking him about mercury in vaccines. Finally, in 2005, a mother brought a huge stack of files/copies of studies to his door and stated that she was not leaving until he read them.
As he read through the data, he was astounded. Vaccines are not safety tested with the same process as Meds - double blind placebo process that takes about 5 years. They were defined as a biologic, and exempt from the rigorous safety testing required for medicines.
The pre-cursor to the CDC was actually a Quasi Military group related to being prepared for biological warfare.
In 1986 Vaccine makers came to congress to get blanket immunity due to all the lawsuits/lack of profit-no way to make vaccines that are 100% safe.
So the US vaccine injury fund was set up, and the manufactures got immunity, but were required to put all potential side effects on the vax inserts.
They can be sued for causing a problem that is not on the insert. There are about 420 side effects listed on the inserts.
For the problems on the insert, people have to file claims with the agency that oversees the vaccine injury fund which has paid out billions over the years.
When he was a child, there were 3 vaccines required. Now there are 72 on the schedule, and a number of conditions that were rare have become much more common with the advent of this increase in vaccines.
Fifty percent of the FDA budget is provided by Pharma, WHO also get around 50% from Pharma, and Roger Aisles told him that Pharma Ads provide around 70% of their revenue. And of course Bill Gates provides his largess to various groups.
RFK is PRO Safety, Transparency, and a fully informed public. He feels that vaccines should be required to have the more rigorous research the New Meds have to under go.
He has some legitimate concerns, but the label anti-vaxer enables people to just dismiss those concerns, and act like the 3 wise monkeys sitting on a shelf. Hope that helps to answer your question. Is he an anti-vaxer--You decide.
Understood. Worth mentioning your dad’s situation on your next visit.
If there’s actual evidence of clotting happening (e.g. J&J), then it’s absolutely worth considering. 100% on board with that. It’s worth studying, finding the frequency, whether it differs from background frequency, and under what conditions it occurs so you can begin to understand the causal mechanism. That will be useful for understanding who is at risk and how to change the medicine in question to avoid that risk if possible. When the clotting reports with the J&J vaccine began to exceed background rates, that absolutely deserved a full investigation. And it got one. When incidence of myocarditis among young males exceeded background rates with the mRNA vaccines, that absolutely deserved an investigation, and it got one there as well.
But when someone is claiming crazy doomsday scenarios without a shred of evidence (and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; not LESS evidence), then get the man a sandwich board and put him out in Times Square with the rest of the doomsday kooks.
One way to cheat in vaccines studies is giving the placebo group something that contains some ingredients of the vaccine.
But when someone is claiming crazy doomsday scenarios without a shred of evidence (and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; not LESS evidence), then get the man a sandwich board and put him out in Times Square with the rest of the doomsday kooks.
Say kooks, nut jobs and flat earthers a few more times in your post, so you will sound more believable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.