[Steve_Seattle]

I would need more than this one raw statistic to make an evaluation. I would like to know:

1. How old were the people who died?

2. What did they die of?

3. How soon did they die after receiving the vaccine?

4. Did they have pre-existing conditions?

5. How certain is the connection between the vaccine and the cause of death?

If many of the deaths were of otherwise healthy people under the age of 50, and if the cause of death is very similar among those who died, that would be a serious red flag. But if most of the deaths were of elderly people who might have died anyway, not so much.

[fuzzylogic]

yeah....there’s too much of “correlation equals causation” going on. With massive numbers receiving a shot it’s inevitable that people die in a short period after getting it - they would have died anyway.

Nobody seems to provide answers to key questions.

[silverleaf]

We know most of the elderly were vaxxed months ago, at the onset of the program

The deaths occurring now are people vaccinated in lower age tiers

We’re just getting started on the teens

Dr Zelenko estimates if you make it 3 months post-shot without clotting effects, you may have passed the danger period…but really, nobody knows

Now several docs are warning that the RNA vaxx leads to micro clots that are so small they are often not diagnosed. These small clots block the capillaries, leading to inflammation and cell death in organs like lungs, heart, brain, kidneys…organs that don’t regenerate. Hence permanent damage and loss of function. As the heart works harder to pump blood through blocked capillaries, patients will develop pulmonary hypertension and a severely reduced lifespan

[SkyDancer]

Talk to the parents of healthy kids who’ve died from the vaxx.

[fr_freak]

I would need more than this one raw statistic to make an evaluation. I would like to know:

This is all so incredibly Orwellian. These were the very questions people were asking a year and a half ago when every death in the world seemed to be attributed to COVID, and such questions, while essential to make a proper assessment of the real risk of COVID19, were laughed off as "denial".

Now that the "vaccines" are being assessed for their risk, suddenly these very same questions are oh so important and we shouldn't just assume that sudden deaths are attributable to the "vaccine".

Normally I would say that asking such questions is proper for BOTH situations in order to assess risk vs reward properly, but given that there has been so much BS surrounding this whole "pandemic", I now say that I'll consider the "vaccine" unnecessary unless I see hard, provable evidence to the contrary, especially in the light of the obvious overcounting of COVID-related deaths, and therefore ANY RISK whatsoever that these "vaccines" present is too much.