Skip to comments.
This Tank-Engine-Powered Ford Crown Vic Sounds Utterly Absurd (27-liter World War II tank engine)
Car and Driver ^
| 7-11-21
| Mack Hogan
Posted on 07/11/2021 5:32:14 AM PDT by dynachrome
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: dynachrome
That car does not even have steering.
21
posted on
07/11/2021 8:48:11 AM PDT
by
Revel
To: dynachrome
Engine is set too far back. Should have moved it forward considerably and modded the front clip thereby retaining the dash and most of the firewall. Would have done a lot of things differently on this beast especially turbo location as well as exhaust.
22
posted on
07/11/2021 10:12:49 AM PDT
by
LastDayz
(A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
To: dynachrome
Driver placement is going to be tricky... looks like he’ll end up somewhere in the rear seats region.
23
posted on
07/11/2021 10:37:19 AM PDT
by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
To: dynachrome
All this prattle about horsepower when it’s really the torque that counts. The stock Meteor makes 1550 lb-ft of Q @1600 rpm. Jay Leno has a 1934 Rolls-Royce P2 he’s dropped a 27-liter Rolls-Royce Merlin engine into (the Meteor was developed from the Merlin) that turns a max Q of 1750 lb-ft. The car will run 80 mph in top gear ... at idle.
To: Rurudyne
Just FYI, the Crown Vic is a full frame car. Bodywork has no part in the structural strength. That said, the torque from that engine is going to force some serious improvements to the frame’s rigidity...
25
posted on
07/11/2021 4:08:45 PM PDT
by
Don W
(When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
To: Don W
I’m talking about the chunk of frame that would have been under the windshield, which they cut away.
26
posted on
07/11/2021 4:12:24 PM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Rurudyne
Here's a photo of a Crown Vic frame. You will notice that the frame comes out to the wheels immediately after the between-wheels (under the engine) crossmember, which appears to be intact in the video. If the between-wheels crossmember were removed, bolting the frame rails directly to the engine block would serve the purpose of the between-wheels crossmember, which is to reinforce the front frame crossmember.
This is called a *perimeter ladder* frame, for obvious reasons. Early 1960's design.
27
posted on
07/11/2021 4:37:29 PM PDT
by
Don W
(When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
To: Don W
I didn’t realize they were the last non-truck frame on body.
28
posted on
07/11/2021 4:55:42 PM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Rurudyne
29
posted on
07/11/2021 4:56:11 PM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Paal Gulli
I absolutely agree... We made a mistake when we trended from small bore long stroke engines to large bore short stroke engines. That chasing of RPMs was a mistake, we should have chased torque instead. It can always be geared up because of the lower RPM.
30
posted on
07/11/2021 5:20:38 PM PDT
by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: dynachrome
I remember seeing a video that teased “a 55 Chevy with a Mustang engine.”
One soon found out that it wasn’t an engine out of a Ford Mustang, but a P-51 Mustang Rolls Royce Merlin.
31
posted on
07/11/2021 5:25:31 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson