Posted on 07/09/2021 12:43:46 PM PDT by ransomnote
The 9,048 deaths reported in the CDC's update likely represent less than 1% of the actual events occurring following Covid 'vaccination,' which means that actual death rates could be 100 times higher, as high as 900,000.
35% of all reports of VAERS adverse events reports over the past 30 years are for Covid-19 'vaccines' administered in the last 7 months.
49% of all reports of deaths in VAERS 30 year history are for Covid vaccines.
TEXT VERSION BELOW
VAERS COVID Vaccine Data
(Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, USA)
438,440 Reports
Through July 7, 2021
*
jump to browse highlighted reports
9,048
DEATHS
26,818
HOSPITALIZATIONS
56,970
URGENT CARE
80,269
OFFICE VISITS
2,152
ANAPHYLAXIS
2,486
BELL’S PALSY
985
Miscarriages
3,324
Heart Attacks
2,200
Myocarditis/Pericarditis
2,226
Thrombocytopenia/
Low Platelet
7,823
Life Threatening
19,105
Severe Allergic Reaction
7,463
Disabled
5,118
Tinnitus
PING
>>actual death rates could be 100 times higher, as high as 900,000.
Yea, OK - 900,000 deaths from the vaccine - put down the crack pipe buddy.
so your thesis is that an ‘extra’ 890,000 people died from the vaccine - just nobody bothered to report it to anyone....do you even read what you post?
Yet you believe 600,000 people died of covid.
Terrifying, especially when you consider that VAERS has historically undercounted events by 10x - 100x.
start at 2:45 in this clip (youtube) were he admits that that flu vaccine isn't directly so effective in older people (young people who get it cut down on the spread which benefits older people).
(3:15)
GATES: You know, if we have, you know, one in 10,000 side effects, that's, you know, way more— 700,000—you know, people who will suffer from that. So really understanding the safety at gigantic scale across all age ranges—you know, pregnant, male, female, undernourished, existing comorbidities—it's very, very hard. And that actual decision of, “OK, let's go and give this vaccine to the entire world,” ah, governments will have to be involved because there will be some risk and indemnification needed before that can be decided on.
I’ll believe the need for a vaccine is real as soon as they close the border and start offering the same vaccine to immigrants.
| qwerty1234 wrote: |
so your thesis is that an ‘extra’ 890,000 people died from the vaccine - just nobody bothered to report it to anyone....do you even read what you post? |
ransomnote: I read and research before I post. It's not my thesis;, it's based on research and evidence.
This level of under reporting could not happen without 'help' from the CDC. The true picture is likely much worse than I've pointed out - my comments are conservative.
It's somewhat 'rare' for adverse reactions following Covid vaccinations to be reported to the CDC. There's window dressing - a website that says staff are required to report adverse events following vaccination - but many doctors don't even know what VAERS is, and those that do often skip reporting because if it's not already on the CDC's 'known' list of side effects, they think it doesn't count; and some doctors say they don't have time to fill out 5 pages of check boxes and blanks. Doctors do understand, and have been watching, other doctors being threatened by actions which supposedly contribute to 'vaccine hesitancy' so there's no real interest in reporting.
But 10 years ago, Harvard researched VAERS and found that about 1% of all actual events were reported to the CDC (see the Lazarus Report) In that time, the CDC has done NOTHING to improve reporting. They don't want reports - they only established VAERS in response to a congressional demand to do so following cases of vaccine harm.
Now that medical facilities have reduced capacity due to lockdowns, doctors have even less time/interest in reporting adverse events.
So, I believe the actual number of deaths following Covid vaccination is actually hundreds of times larger. I say hundred because the CDC is withholding records of adverse events following Covid 'vaccination'. What a thing to do at a time like this! But they must be withholding those reports for optics - gotta push the vax. They had a year to prepare the database and staffing to vaccinate the entire US public and they still just can't update VAERS with the rest of the records they are withholding.
There are ludicrous assertions that all deaths are carefully evaluated to deterimine 'cause of death' by coronorers. I think this post reveals the farce behind that notion.
A Covid Death? The Bureaucracy Decides (freerepublic.com)
The elderly dying at home or in nursing facilities following vaccination are often wrongly dismissed as "It was just his time to go" as is shown in this horrified whistleblower account from a Certified Nursing Assistant:
Many people report significant difficulties in reporting to the CDC in the first place. Those trying to call in, including doctors, report that no one answers the phone. Those using the intentionally difficult user interface screen to try to report an adverse even find themselves automatically logged out without warning ever 20 minutes, so they have to start over from the beginning.
Then if you somehow file a report, they only give you a temporary ID. They then give themselves 4 to 6 weeks to vett your report. After or if a report is actually published to VAERS, the CDC still deletes some records of deaths.
Those reported to VAERS are a mixture of 'caused by vax' and 'not caused by vax'. I've read many, many records in VAERS and think that if others read them, they will notice as I have that almost all are, "He was fine until he got the vax". There are family stories and films on the Internet of people having continuous seizures which started the day they were vaccinated.
I’ll believe the need for a vaccine is real as soon as they close the border and start offering the same vaccine to immigrants.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...and if they do away with the PCR test, which does not identify the Covid virus, or the illness in people
...and if they stop running tests like the PCR at different cycles based on vaccination status in order to falsely portray ‘vaccines’ a working
...and if the filthy elites can keep their masks on as if they actually believe this farce
...and, and, and...if....
My beautiful, healthy niece was hospitalized with tinnitus and complications thereof. Vibrating eye, serious loss of balance. She was in a walker and maybe still is. Her mom(my sister), of course urged her to get shots. My sister’s smart husband knows it’s from the shots but we’re not telling sister or niece.
Tens of Thousands of COVID-19 "Vaccine" Injured in the U.S. Begging for Help (bitchute.com)
I already had tinnitus - it got worse the day after my first vaccine, which I only got b/c a trip is requiring it. Sorry for your niece.
I’m wondering if it’s the carrier molecule rather than an immune response, but who knows. It’s a total crap shoot - some people who already had tinnitus have done fine, some have returned to baseline and others have not.
The schools and companies who are mandating the vaccine are messing with people’s lives.
ransomnote wrote: “So, I believe the actual number of deaths following Covid vaccination is actually hundreds of times larger. I say hundred because the CDC is withholding records of adverse events following Covid ‘vaccination’.”
You’ve made several unstated assumptions.
First, you’re assuming that data from 10 years ago remains valid.
Second, you’re assuming that reporting failures across all possible adverse reactions are applicable to deaths.
Third, you’re assuming that these 900,000 deaths would not show up in excess mortality statistics.
IOW, your analysis is highly questionable.
Thanks for response re tinnitus. I haven’t talked to Julie for a week, will call her tonight.
I have not had vax. My very smart doctor literally prescribes nutritional supplements for me—everything now said to boost immune system. I’ve been taking them every morning for the last 40+ years. When I saw him a couple of weeks ago, he asked if I’d had vax. I said, “No, I was going to ask you whether I should but you’re a doctor and have to say yes.” By this time, we’re both laughing.
“You look very healthy to me,” he said. “Go home, come back in 6 months.”
Did I luck out on a doctor, or what? He’s the one assigned to me by my HMO.
Past misbehavior by Big Pharma...pic.twitter.com/ht9AgR2v1z— Jessisdoingit (@jessisdoingit) July 9, 2021
Terrifying, especially when you consider that VAERS has historically undercounted events by 10x - 100x.
———————
9,000 deaths from the vax is “ voluntary “ reported. This whole Covid hoax is political, all figures have been jacked with, misreported, or simply not recorded or reported. This whole Covid flu stinks, from Biden’s corrupted government pushing mandatory jabs to a corrupted CDC, WHO and lack of alternative treatments ( zinc, Ivermectin, etc)…wake up America, you have been had….time is beginning to tell that story. The “ awakening “ will change our corrupted Government.
…at risk of being perceived as uncaring, I do believe the poor “ smucks” that rushed into the MRNA jabs will eventually wake up, but unfortunately the effects are irreversible, it’s not a pill to discontinue, but an experimental concoction that they elected to have injected into their bodies. God help them.
ransomnote wrote: “So, I believe the actual number of deaths following Covid vaccination is actually hundreds of times larger. I say hundred because the CDC is withholding records of adverse events following Covid ‘vaccination’.”
DugwayDuke wrote: You’ve made several unstated assumptions.
First, you’re assuming that data from 10 years ago remains valid.
The circumstances have actually gotten worse.
The Database was 20 years old at the time it was determind to be housing a tiny fraction of actual events.
Having used the interface to generate reports, I can attest to it's poor maintenance. It has redundant fields, both of which much be addressed or information drops out of searches. I get different search results for no reason when selecting inocuous choices.
The CDC says it takes 4 to 6 weeks to vett reports received, but I find hundreds of records which don't list the vaccine for which the record is filed - it just says 'unknown'. But if I search the event description field I see the words 'covid'. The same is true for other fields identified as 'unknown'. The information is present but ignored, missing fields which harm search results cause records to be ignored.
A basic, inexcusable of intentional poor design and neglect is that the CDC states it will not update records after first enterred.
So a person undergoing an ER visit, cardiac arrest/stroke has record of an adverse event the same day as 'vaccination'. Once the report is filed, no further record updates will occurr so if they die the next day, next week, next month VAERS is not updated. If they spiral from the point of vaccination through worsening conditions which began the day of injection to the point of death 2 months later, VAERS is not updated.
This is the intentional decision of the CDC given the responsibility of monitoring experimental 'vaccines' with limited testing and no long term data. HOW could VAERS be an accurate record of adverse events if, after harrowing accounts of near death experiences the day of injection, the records are never updated? A person paralyzed, with stroke and heart failure is transferred out of ER and we're to assume all went well from then on? SOmeone has zero platelets and massive cranial clots is assumed to have recovered after transfer to the stroke ward?
The database design and continued decision to not update records is suspicious when you consider all the 'neutral' records of injection medical staff have enterred for young people 'accidentally' injected ('didn't know they weren't old enough'). The records for many teens say, "No adverse event, student was too young" or 'wrong dose' or other error. Now, if ANYTHING happens to those students, there's already a record there so a new adverse event can't be enterred, nor one updated.
Sometimes the CD updates records because they have been detected going in and replacing reports of Covid deaths with entirely different content. The VAERS ID for the patient is the same, the record content is entirely different. This has not been reported for vaccines in the past. Everything is new and worse for the most politicized Plandemic in history, otherwise known as 'biowarfare'.
Watching the absolute censorship and intimidation of medical staff at levels never seen before can inform a rational person that participation in VAERS reporting is unlikely to go up for Covid 'vaccines'. After preventing doctors from writing prescriptions, and physicians being threatened, fired for departing from Fauci talking points, it really is safe to assume participation has decreased.
I've watched a video walkthrough of filing an online VAERS report and marvel at it's poor design. The program logs you out without warning every 20 minutes even though you have so much data to file. Doctors, patients, or the family members of the deceased report not being able to file a report when trying to call in their data. The CDC is not picking up the phone. IS that due to politics? Or is it becaue they are overwhelmed? EIther answer points to a reasonable assumption that this is wore than 2010 research revealed.
There are no published documents stating the CDC's decision to address the problems with reporting that Harvard identified. No public statements about how this will be addressed, no request for funds to make urgently needed updates to VAERS. ALl I see is online demands by vax supporters that VAERS be ignored.
We've never seen the impacts on medical resources and staff like those with Covid. In the past 10 years, insurance companies have continued to tighten time requirements and forced medical staff to streamline oprations and then lockdowns deeply curtailed resources.
With Covid, we are told for the first time in our nation's history that that hospitals and other medical facilities are exhausted of resources, diagnostics and elective surgery were unavailable and are still limited etc. Obviously there are less staff hours avaiable to file reports of adverse events with the CDC.
Reading physicians' accounts of their research includes comments that doctors don't have time, in addition to the CDC just not picking up the phone. I've been told that's because they never anticipated so many reports of adverse events for a vaccine before. Why is it hard to 'assume' that in the past 6 months, when Covid reports make up more than 1 out of every 3 reports in VAERS 30 year history, that it's not just the CDC having a hard time keeping up with reporting, and that those reporting are not able to keep up as never before in history as well?
Second, you’re assuming that reporting failures across all possible adverse reactions are applicable to deaths.
Actually, those tracking CDC reports are able to demonstrate that the CDC is publishing reports selectively and withholding records. The CDC is weaponized, pushing the vax hard and lying about safety. It is reasonable to suspect them to avoid publishing anything they believe will contribute to 'vaccine hesitancy'. That's a new crime the CDC and captured medical establishment has begun to threaten people with - 'contributing to vaccine hesitancy'.
Right now more than 1 out of 3 adverse events reports in VAERS is for Covid vaccines, but socially people expect to feel awful and have adverse events and think it's normal. Fever, muscle aches, nausea, blinding headaches - these are dismissed as 'normal' by those vaccinated and MANY are not reporting them. IN the trials, as many as 80% of participants reported adverse events, that's why some researchers note they don't meet the standard for 'double blind trials' because the participants knew if they felt awful, they didn't have the placebo.
VAERS isn't the only passive, underuitilized system the CDC is using to collect Covid 19 adverse event data. To avoid having 'nasty reports' show up in VAERS, the CDC provided every vaccine recipient with a document, which most ignored, to invite them to report any adverse events to V-Safe, an internal database only available to CDC staff. You see how that works? Keep the information private so it doesn't show up in VAERS.
FReeper Cathi provided the following info about V-safe :
Someone dug into it and this info is interesting.
She found that “Everyone who gets vaccinated will be encouraged to register for the V-SAFE tool.”. Fun fact, she read the pamphlet and registered. I was told nothing and of course I read nothing so didn’t register. So I wondered what the conversion rate was.
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
23h
She found the following: “More than 90 million Americans have received at least one shot, yet the CDC’s v-safe monitoring program has only 6 million participants”. That’s a 6.6% conversion rate. At least does everything reported get to VAERS?
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
23h
“Anyone who reports a clinically important event — missing work, being unable to do normal daily activities or receiving medical care — will get a follow-up phone call and a report may be filed in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)”
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
23h
So basically, it relies on self-reporting, and then being able to answer a call, and then (something) “may” be filed as a report to VAERS. What percentage of events are we supposing is going in to VAERS here? My intent is not to create fears of vaccines, but this is madness.
Alexandros Marinos
@alexandrosM
·
Jul 7
If, as a startup founder, I cared about collecting the data in my pipeline, and my analytics team showed up with this system as representative, they would no longer be my analytics team. This is not what one does when they truly want to gather all data.
Oh and there's the CDC's HOW TO FILE A REPORT WITH VAERS webpage which provides a linked PDF of 'reportable events'. The vaccines and effects for those vaccines are listed in a table. The comprehensive list of 'reportable events/vaccines' does not include Covid vaccines. Everyone accessing the CDC's webpage will find that Covid-19 vaccines are not on the list of events reportable to VAERS.
Since other vaccines (e.g., polio, pertusis) are on the list of reportable events, it's reasonable to believe this has discouraged some wishing to report Covid 'vaccine' adverse events to VAERS. This was still true about 2 weeks ago - so throughout Covid vaccine administration, the public has been given access to a document indicating their adverse events following Covid vaccinations are not reportable. It's fair to assume this impact is disproportionate and does not constitute any sort of improvement over 2010 rates of reporting, given that those Covid 'vaccine' records that DO get published in VAERS already account of over a third of all VAERS reports.
The CDC and others in gov and state/local officials have CERTAINLY gotten the message out that they want you to have the vaccine. Have they made the same effort to tell you to use V-safe or VAERS, or that both exist and you should report to both systems? Are there constant warnings informercials and pressure on your employer to make you register any adverse events with both V-SAFE and VAERS? Is Biden going to have feds go door to door to make sure patients, doctors and other medical staff are reporting to VAERS, and/ patients reporting to V-safe? Or are there social and professional threats to all those implying that the vaccine is responsible for harm?
Third, you’re assuming that these 900,000 deaths would not show up in excess mortality statistics.
IOW, your analysis is highly questionable.
My analysis is highly unpopular, not highly questionable. I don't know how many deaths there are but they have to be far, far above the 9000 deaths reported in VAERS for all the reasons given.
We are now living in a Biden administration and they would naturally control what information is released in terms of mortality statistics. Those conducting biowarfare on the US by coaxing us to get a toxic, unnecessary 'vaccines' containing biowarfare agents were just smart enough not to tell us.
The CDC has a curious little 'misc' field in the mortality stats they do release which contains 50,000 deaths with the note 'cause undetermind'. This is new. There's a hint. I mean, those who counted and reported the votes for the 2020 election are now counting and reporting the deaths.
The CDC wildly inflates death statistics for Covid, only 5% of the total died from Covid alone and that's according to a fake Covid test which does not identify the virus or the illness in people. The PCR has a 97% false positive rate - why would an adminstration lying, locking down and threatening the public not lie about mortality rates? Conscience? Hah!
It's biological warfare and they need our compliance because we outnumber them. Therefore, they are not going to tell us what they are doing or how many are dying. And as for deaths, all those still alive and vaccinated are still at risk - it's not over yet. Who knows what the true toll will be.
The information that does leak out past the gatekeepers is appalling and has always been enough to halt administration.
The chart I post compares year on year deaths. What will the chart look like at the end of 2021 given we're just at the halfway point?
Good for your doctor.
My ENT Dr is seeing these complications and is willing to write me an exemption letter to avoid the 2nd shot, but of course some schools or travel companies may not accept that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.