Fact Checkers: COVID-19 vaccines do not violate the World War II-era Nuremberg Code

twitter events ^ | July 8 | twitter

[RandFan]

The 10-point guidelines established in response to Nazi atrocities during the Holocaust are unrelated to widespread COVID-19 vaccination efforts, according to Lead Stories, FactCheck.org, RMIT ABC and other fact-checkers. Moreover, the Nuremberg Code does not apply to COVID-19 jabs, according to Rappler and Full Fact, because they have undergone extensive clinical trials and have received emergency use authorization around the world.

[DuncanWaring]

See Post 30.

[Salamander]

Wholeheartedly agree.

/WuFluCoup

[greeneyes]

This fact check is total BS. The experiment is still ongoing as acknowledged by the company’s EAU application.
Fact check failure - it’s more like neo-nazi propaganda.

[PerConPat]

Look, I took the vaccine knowing that the risks...

Agree...Life, IMO, is largely a process of the individual practicing the art of the "calculated risk". Arguments pro or con for the jab on a society-wide basis are of no concern to me. Each individual, even if the jab is a condition of employment etc., must choose their own approach. Criticizing those who take or decline the jab is, for me, a waste of time.

[Salamander]

Pushers

[RideForever]

... when these vaccines will have been fully approved.

The Emergency Use Authorization is in effect until 2023.

And where are the control group participants EVER mentioned? Hard to do scientific method without a control group, isn't it?

[kiryandil]

In other words, the quaxxccines DO violate the Nuremberg Code.

[Jane Long]

:-)

Opposite world.

[kiryandil]

because apparently they thought I was on my way to some third world Heart of Darkness vacation.

Say "hey!" to the Colonel for us...

[GraceG]

[Allegra]

The Covid shot itself doesn’t violate the Nuremberg Code, but forcing it on people does.

[GraceG]

“I was only following orders”

WRONG!!! That line is OLD and not LIBERAL enough...

“I was only following orders, FOR YOUR OWN GOOD”

[kiryandil]

It’s not Opposites Day...

[GraceG]

[Salamander]

Ok!

[DugwayDuke]

RideForever wrote: “The Emergency Use Authorization is in effect until 2023.”

Irrelevant. Pfizer has submitted the application for full approval and that approval is expected by the end of the year. Moderna is also preparing the paper for full approval.

[DugwayDuke]

ShadowAce wrote: “No un-”vaccinated” person should be a danger to any “vaccinated” person, right? Why are they, and you, so concerned if I get the jab or not?”

Simply because if there is an outbreak in the unvaccinated we’ll be back to mandatory covid protocals, ie, masks, social distancing, lockdowns, etc.

[DugwayDuke]

RideForever wrote: “And where are the control group participants EVER mentioned? Hard to do scientific method without a control group, isn’t it?”

You haven’t been doing your research.

Try using google for covid phase 3 control group. Sometimes it’s called the placebo group.

[ShadowAce]

Simply because if there is an outbreak in the unvaccinated we’ll be back to mandatory covid protocals, ie, masks, social distancing, lockdowns, etc.

Why would that be the case? You're "vaccinated" right? No chance for *you* to get it, or be affected by any protocols that should only apply to the un-"vaccinated."

[kiryandil]