The judge didn’t compel him to take the stick. He sentenced him to 5 years probation. That’s the sentence. The defendant has the option, not a mandate, to get a reduced sentence if he gets the jab. And that’s why it’s not a constitutional issue. He’s not mandated to accept the alternative sentence. It’s simply an option.
I can’t explain it, but I know when something is just not right.
I see it more like 5 years probation or ECT that you don’t really need and is unrelated to your crime.
Uh...maybe that’s it. The second option is unrelated to the crime. The judge has options in the sentencing by statute and getting an experimental vaccine isn’t one of them.