Untested means not tested.
At all.
There have been, and continue to be, mountains of tests for these vaccines. They have repeatedly passed testing, all around the World.
When you have to keep moving the goalposts, and changing the definition of common words, it is a sure sign that you are not telling the simple truth.
When you have to keep moving the goalposts, and changing the definition of common words, it is a sure sign that you are not telling the simple truth.
~~~~~~~~~~
You mean like the way the CDC rewrote the definition of ‘vaccine’ to protect the Covid ‘shots’? People criticized them for it so they restored the definition without comment.
“Untested means not tested. At all.”
Sham testing doesn’t count, you know? You can’t fake your way through half baked tests and claim that you performed industry standard testing when you did not. You can’t phone it in or fake it and expect people to ‘agree’ with your assertion it’s been tested. It’s been propped up as if it were tested using industry standard procedures and protected by the FDA/CDC/NIH from normal scrutiny.
It’s dead, Jim.
I wasn’t tested. It was faked.
Untested means not tested.
At all.
There have been, and continue to be, mountains of tests for these vaccines. They have repeatedly passed testing, all around the World.
When you have to keep moving the goalposts, and changing the definition of common words, it is a sure sign that you are not telling the simple truth.
********************************************************************************
🤦‍♀️You are full of BS. I have not used the word untested. I also have not moved any goal posts and I am not the one changing the definition of common words.
You are NOT telling the simple truth.
Simple truth is that the testing is not finished and you know it yet, deliberately ignore that fact and try to act like it is done.
And there have not been long term human trials either. So the statements that you make about trials and and passing are only relevant to the short time-frame they have been utilized in humans.
Now while others may consider the quality of the testing to be deficient, I deliberately stayed away from such - I stated only what is KNOWN UNDISPUTED FACTS.
And yet you try to OBFISCATE as if all of the testing has been completed-when clearly according to their own documents the companies have not finished their testing.
What everyone on this thread knows is fact, you dispute. You truly need to get a grip on reality. SMH.
‘I think that these vaccines will be safe in the sense that they won’t cause a serious or permanent adverse event when tested in 10,000, 15,000, 20,000 people’... ‘HOPEFULLY, that will also be true in post-approval when it’s tested and seen in 20 million, 30 million people.’
- Dr. Paul A. Offit with the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
What is the basis for emergency authorization when we have multiple effective treatment protocols currently in use?
Even if you believed that using old people as guinea pigs was OK, why would you give an experimental vaccine to groups with close to ZERO deaths from cv-19? I know, I know: “because we can”. You Mengele-bots are so tricky.