Skip to comments.
The Navy’s electromagnetic railgun is officially dead
Task and Purpose ^
| July 6, 2021
| Jared Keller
Posted on 07/06/2021 12:16:14 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
About time this boondogle was cancelled.
1
posted on
07/06/2021 12:16:14 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
To: Yo-Yo
So, it’s been electrocuted?.................
2
posted on
07/06/2021 12:19:58 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: Yo-Yo
I’m a little disappointed. I was hoping to see the railgun mounted on California’s high-speed train. It would have made one heck of a coastal defense weapon, and so well worth the expense.
3
posted on
07/06/2021 12:20:04 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: Yo-Yo
Not a woke project, no future in it.
To: Midwesterner53
Biden wants to shoot 16 inch shells filled with money at the CCP.
5
posted on
07/06/2021 12:21:13 PM PDT
by
Colt1851Navy
(What was wrong with Nixon?)
To: Yo-Yo
“The Navy announced on Friday that the service has “decided to pause” research and development of the much-hyped electromagnetic railgun (or EMRG) at the end of 2021 in light of the growing need for tranny surgeries, the effort to root out evil white supremacists, and conducting critically important CRT indoctrination sessions and struggle sessions.
6
posted on
07/06/2021 12:22:47 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“I’m not a conspiracy theorist....but, I don’t believe in coincidences, either.” ~ Steve Bannon)
To: Yo-Yo
I don’t think of it as a boondoggle. It would have been amazingly cheap to launch solid metal missiles without needing fuel. This would have allowed ships to have more missiles on board.
They just found something better in the form of lasers.
7
posted on
07/06/2021 12:25:44 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
(Just because I coughed on you does not mean that I have covid. It means that we have covid. )
To: Yo-Yo
In other words, Emperor Xi was afraid of it and wanted development of it stopped.
Is this a repeat of the Democrats slowing down SDI (missile defense) every time they're in office, under the auspices of not wanting to make Russia mad?
8
posted on
07/06/2021 12:26:00 PM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: Yo-Yo
If high speed rail in California was cancelled we’d have something.
9
posted on
07/06/2021 12:30:24 PM PDT
by
TauntedTiger
(Political correctness analyst/expert/victim)
To: Yo-Yo
Does this also include the catapault on the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) ?
10
posted on
07/06/2021 12:33:43 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(I'm old enough to remember metal toys in Cracker-Jacks.)
To: Yo-Yo
Probably developed something more lethal
11
posted on
07/06/2021 12:33:53 PM PDT
by
setter
To: Jonty30
“They just found something better in the form of lasers.”
About the time naval guns became super-sophisticated, autoloading, remote control weapons stations, they were obsoleted by missiles on smaller boats and lasers on large ships. That doesn’t mean such guns will vanish, especially on craft that do not mount sophisticated radars. But they will be more rare.
The point is, some technologies that seemed like a great idea at the time, can become obsolete even before they get fielded. Actually, that’s the ideal time to find out something is obsolete. But the science behind some of these developments may get carried forward in unexpected ways. Microcircuits, heart implants and the internet all had their start on military projects.
12
posted on
07/06/2021 12:36:18 PM PDT
by
Gen.Blather
(Wait! I said that out loud? )
To: Jonty30
I don’t think of it as a boondoggle. It would have been amazingly cheap to launch solid metal missiles without needing fuel. This would have allowed ships to have more missiles on board. The launcher ate its rail electrodes with every shot, requiring a complete rebuild after a dozen shots.
13
posted on
07/06/2021 12:47:29 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Yo-Yo
Rail guns always sound cool. But in practice that is a LOT of energy to try to put on a portable system.
14
posted on
07/06/2021 12:51:00 PM PDT
by
discostu
(Like a dog being shown a card trick )
To: Jonty30
The problem with the superguns was discovered by the Nazis in 1935 or so.
Since they were rail mounted, their locations could be easily pinpointed. The superguns also required vast resources to defend them.
15
posted on
07/06/2021 12:51:03 PM PDT
by
HIDEK6
(God bless Donald Trump. )
To: Yo-Yo
Why doesn’t the Navy just preemptively surrender to Communist China, and be done with it once and for all?
16
posted on
07/06/2021 12:51:34 PM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
To: HIDEK6
This isn’t about guns mounted on railroad cars. A rail gun is an electromagnetic projectile launcher. Muzzle velocities can be as high as several kilometers per second.
17
posted on
07/06/2021 12:54:22 PM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
To: Yo-Yo
What about the tin can that was supposed to carry the railgun? If that’s not also cancelled, this is just a shell game.
18
posted on
07/06/2021 12:56:32 PM PDT
by
jz638
To: Yo-Yo
Paused so the CHICOMS can catch up/surpass the US?
19
posted on
07/06/2021 12:58:56 PM PDT
by
ASOC
(This space for rent)
To: Gen.Blather
Yep. Gotta research stuff. Sometimes “no” is an answer.
20
posted on
07/06/2021 1:03:34 PM PDT
by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson