[woodbutcher1963]

The difference is that Hillary was smarter and a much better liar.

I really do not understand what the Dem establishment have against Tulsi. I am not advocating Tulsi. She is by far the most likable of all the Dem candidates had for POTUS. She must have principals or something.

[ratzoe]

I really do not understand what the Dem establishment have against Tulsi. I am not advocating Tulsi. She is by far the most likable of all the Dem candidates had for POTUS. She must have principals or something.

In a legitimate election, she was the only one that I thought had a prayer against Trump. I definitely disagree with most of her stances but she did come off as a more level headed candidate than any of the others. But, as we saw, the DNC wanted puppets for this this rigged election and they did come up with outstanding choices.

[pepsi_junkie]

The difference is that Hillary was smarter and a much better liar.

A bigger difference is that Hillary was married to Bill Clinton. No matter what we think of him, Bill was / is popular with democrats (especially before Obama tore America apart along racial lines and now some lefties consider him racist). The ONLY reason Hillary Clinton is anybody is because she married Bill Clinton. Period. But that was enough to almost make her President.

Harris keeps her husband hidden behind a curtain because ... white. Not an asset at all politically. She was picked for the job she has, she didn't earn a single vote, not in primaries or in the general election.

And yet she'll end up President most likely even though nobody likes her or voted for her.