Do you get 96/127 early pregnancies spontaneously terminated for women in the study, or are you saying that there are many other women In The study, with early jabs, and they are still pregnant.
If that is the case (this group is still pregnant), then This was written very poorly, and the dataset is premature to publish.
I can’t speak for ETCM, but I the way I read this study is that there are many women in the study who got jabs early in pregnancy and did not lose their baby or it is still gestating in them.
I didn’t find the study to be that particularly poorly written. It was written in a way that is par for the course with these types of studies.
Now would it be ethical for an OB to use this study as the basis for advising his newly pregnant patient to get the vax? I personally don’t think so.
—Especially when this very same OB is likely advising her not to drink, to cut back on caffeine significantly, perhaps to stop taking her hay fever meds, to stop cleaning the cat box, to stop eating meat with lots of nitrates, to wear cotton and not polyester underwear, and any host of other things.
And this is coming from me, one of the biggest proponents on FR of the ‘rona being a plandemic and the vax being part of this plan.