Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

May 5, the CDC admitted in an update that only 5% of the death tally were patients who only had ‘covid’ diagnoses.The other 95% had an average of 4 co-morbidities (hint: they died with covid, not from Covid).

The PCR test does not identify the Covid Virus or the illness, so it’s unknown what any of them actually died of,but we can be certain that treating sick people with safe effective medications like HCQ and Ivermectin would lower the rate of death dramatically.

This was a fake hyped ‘plandemic’ and people were denied treatment just to make a statistic to rave about. Crimes against humanity.

Safe, effective treatments which cut risk of hospitalization and death among the most vulnerable (elderly, co-morbidities) by 85% have always been available. There's no need to become a lab experiment for toxic 'shots'.

Early Treatment Protocols (Collection of Covid-19 resources, treatment and prophylactic protocols)

Dr. Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer’s Allergy and Infectious Diseases division, said that a researcher located those who’d had SARS1 in 2003 and tested them this year, with that original SARS1 virus. Those people were still immune, after 17 years.

The researcher then tested those people with SARS2 (Covid). Those people were immune. There is ‘only’ a 22% difference in the genomes between Sars1 and Sars2 and so immunity held.

But note those ill in 2003 did not maintain active antibodies for 17 years. Their immune sytem hibernated those (my words) antibodies until it recognized the pathogen from years ago and began producing antibodies.

There are two wings to the immune system and Big Pharma is focusing on ‘active antibodies’ as if that is an accurate indicator of immunity. It actually means ‘activated immunity’, when you may have immunity but haven’t been exposed in so long you don’t have the antibodies.

Dr. Yeadon says the ‘variants’ are no more than 1% or 2% different from Covid and those who’ve had Covid will be immune to the variants.

The Deep State just wants a repeat performance, They want to put us through the lockdowns and panic as if it never happened before; they like the way we obeyed and want to see it again. :(

3 posted on 07/02/2021 10:10:57 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

👍


4 posted on 07/02/2021 10:21:42 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

That’s likely bogus data. How does one test someone for SARS?

They took blood samples and looked for antibody titers. This is not a test.

A test is infecting the subject with the SARS virus and observing the result. Since this did not happen and could never happen, there was no test.


5 posted on 07/03/2021 12:11:44 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

The problem with early treatment: Nobody glows red when they’re infected. It’d be so much easier if we got a rash or bumps or something.

That and the incubation is slow. Come day nine or 10, you’re in trouble. Now the Time to Death is 18 days average and the clock is ticking. So there’s no messing around.

If you’re lucky enough to be mildly symptomatic before you crash, so you know it’s time to act fast, then invermectin may be good. The ICON study found that invermectin was most useful in patients that had “ severe pulmonary involvement’, but once on ventilator, it didn’t affect ventilated time or mortality outcome.

here’s the dosing/mortality stats:
https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/ivermectin-treat-covid-19-coronavirus-3535912/

otoh, this study is a study of the studies and shows no appreciable effect:

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab591/6310839

It took time to figure all this out, so you can’t really claim people were ‘denied treatment’

Same story with HCQ:
Meta-Analysis 1
PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, Joanna Briggs Institute Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) for all articles published between 01 January 2020 to 15 September 2020 ,,,A search of grey literature repositories (New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature and Open Grey), and pre-publication server deposits (medRxIV and bioRxIV) was also performed.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33678548/

Meta-Analysis 2 -
Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies published until October 15, 2020

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33815925/


8 posted on 07/03/2021 12:42:19 AM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

ransomnote wrote: “The PCR test does not identify the Covid Virus or the illness, so it’s unknown what any of them actually died of,but we can be certain that treating sick people with safe effective medications like HCQ and Ivermectin would lower the rate of death dramatically.”

Show us the peer reviewed study documented in a credible medical journal (bitchute videos don’t count) that HCH and Ivermectin are safe and effective.

Show us the peer reviewed study documented in a credible medical journal (bitchute videos don’t count) that HCH and Ivermectin lower the rate of death more than the vaccines.


11 posted on 07/03/2021 4:40:16 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson