Business Insider is a propaganda arm of the oligarch class (i.e., commies) in the United States. Clearly they side with election fraudsters.
“Arizona law entitles the public
to know how this audit is being
conducted and funded*\
You’d think this ‘ news’ paper
would recognize
“Arizona law entitles the public
to know how this election was
being conducted and funded.
And that paper isn’t “ Arizona”.
It’s a private entertainment rag
along the lines of the Babylon Bee
and not entitled to dog crap.
Jmho.
The “free” press is suing a group that is try to get to the truth. Welcome to the USSA.
The insanity continues...... it is amazing because this audit we are finding out who the Rats really are!
As I’ve followed events this audit is not simply a recount of votes. It is an audit. It does things like checking ballot signatures against registration signatures, checking that mail-in ballots have fold marks, checking that voters addresses represent domiciles, checking that counted ballots were the correct ballots for the listed addresses, and counting numbers of counted ballots against the numbers of voters for each ballot type.
These tasks take lots of time to perform, and each ballot check relies on the other ballot checks before it can be validated. It would be impossible to render a preliminary count.
Auditing the auditors!
Gotta love it! Who’s going to monitor the Arizona Republic to make sure it is properly handling its review of audit-related communications?
Isaiah 5:20.
The democrats will try anything to interfere with this audit and the release of the outcome!
2
They do not want to report the results.
Business Insider, clearly a Democratic screed, is going to find out that they’ve wasted a lot of money on lawyers for nothing.
ANY “serious” communication will be conducted through lawyers who are protected by the stone wall of “attorney-client privilege. That’s where the cliché “beating your head against the wall” came from.
...and if the judge imposes a gag order, Business Insider can’t report on their own fake news story.
Gannett Co., Inc
WE ARE COMMITTED TO:
I. Seeking and reporting the truth in a truthful way
We will be honest in the way we gather, report and present news - with relevancy, persistence, context, thoroughness, balance, and fairness in mind.
We will seek to gain understanding of the communities, individuals and issues we cover to provide an informed account of activities.
We will hold factual information in editorials and other opinion pieces to the same standards of accuracy as news stories.
We will treat information from unofficial sources, which may include social media, with skepticism and will seek to corroborate information.
When considering news content created outside of the Network, we will factor the credibility of the source and weigh the value and accuracy of information provided.
The fact audit is in quotes in the headline tells you all you need to know about this source and it’s bias
How about suing the newspaper to find out which Democrats gave them the idea of investigating and now suing Cyber Ninjas, and who is financing the lawsuit?
But our side SHOULD be noting the collusion here between the newspaper and the Democrats - it’s a way for the Democrats to fight the audit, while keeping their hands clean.
They just want to know who the donors are so they can dox, intimidate and cancel them.
This lawsuit sounds like a classic case of ‘lack of standing’.
I see the media is putting quotes around the word audit, to not so subtly infer that it’s not really an audit.
Advice to Arizona Republic: Don’t ask the question if you don’t want to hear the honest answer. This is called stepping in to it.
Sounds like a totally unbiased, objective media report to me.
No questions about the reeking dirty 2020 "vote" in Maricopa - but they're ALL OVER the real audit...