I had to dig into the statistical analysis of the paper.
Man these idiots can’t write.
Descriptive analyses were performed
with the use of v-safe survey data for persons
who identified as pregnant through February 28,
2021 (35,691 persons); persons enrolled in the
v-safe pregnancy registry who were vaccinated
through February 28, 2021 (3958 persons); and
VAERS reports involving pregnant women received through February 28, 2021 (221 persons).
Then go back up to the TOP to the results section.
Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in
a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included
preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal
deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of
adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19
who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies
involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most
frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
So if you were in v-safe, you’re one of 35,691.
If you’re in v-safe, AND jabbed through Feb 28 2021 you’re one of 3958.
If you’re in v-safe, and jabbed through Feb 28 2021, AND YOU STOPPED BEING PREGNANT, you’re one of the 827.
115 of the completed pregnancies were a loss.
Then you have to do the crosstab for those jabbed during the first trimester, yada yada.
NEJM is vastly overrated, from this article.