Thanks, aMorePerfectUnion
hey palmer. *PING*
Wheatley pointed out that the “real rate” of spontaneous miscarriages among women vaccinated in the first 20 weeks of their pregnancy was not 12.6% but 82% because 104 of these 127 pregnancies were lost. She highlighted the “small print” in the study that stated that a “total of 700 participants (84.6) received their first eligible dose in the third trimester” and that a “total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation.”
That matches the table in the study which I linked, nothing has been changed one iota. Nothing was censored or hidden. So why did LifeSiteNews pull it?
Their source said 104 out of 827 women lost their pregnancies in the first trimester. But 700 out of the 827 were not injected until their third trimester. Therefore 82% (104/127).
The study says "Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among particpants with vaccination in the third trimester)."
That's the statement the LifeSiteNews source took issue with. I read the study. 3958 participants (94% healthcare). 1132 vaxed in the first trimester, 1714 second, and 1019 third. Then there's 1040 first, 1700 second. Then there's 827 completed pregnancies with 712 live births, 700 of which were third.
I don't know where the 827 comes from.