'Huge red flag’: Medical researchers bury data showing 82% miscarriage rate in vaccinated women

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/huge-red-flag-medical-researchers-bury-data-showing-82-miscarriage-rate-in-vaccinated-women?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=standard ^

[grey_whiskers]

You’re misunderstanding the way I meant it.

If your first jab is in the 2nd trimester, that gives you ZERO information over whether jabs in the first trimester are liable to be harmful.

If you get a jab in the first, then the 3rd trimester, then if anything bad happens after the first jab, well, maybe the first jab did it; but the second jab is off the hook.

[palmer]

True, the timing would be obvious in those cases. And my understanding is 80% of miscarriages are trimester 1.

[ETCM]

What happened to the 79% that did not complete their pregnancy? That's what I want to know.

This a preliminary report, not a completed study. The Data was gathered just 4 weeks after the last participants were enrolled, and just 11 weeks after the first participant was enrolled. Many will have been born (and probably a few more miscarriages) in the 3 months since March 30, but many of the women are still pregnant. The last babies in the study won't be born until November 2021.

[palmer]

Thanks. It's pretty clear the original Life Site News was wrong. They were either misled by the woman they interviewed or they both didn't realize that the study was incomplete. They have pulled the story, quite properly.

The only way they can get to (almost) 82% miscarriage is if 100% of the remaining pregnancies are miscarriages and still births. Based on the data so far, that's not going to happen. But it will be crucial to get the rest of the statistics to know the full story.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Thanks for taking time.

I’d like to know how many abortions were in each trimester, since the article referenced 20 weeks and before as the period of 82% abortion rate…

[palmer]

I mistakenly thought the rest (82%) were aborted. But there's only a max of 31% spotaneous or induced abortion so far, and only if you use their word "majority" as 50% plus 1. Chances are "majority'" is higher than that. It's a very poor writeup lacking that number.

They don't have numbers for either the "majority" (which are unresolved), the total number of losses so far, or the breadown of those losses between spontaneus and induced abortion. I have no idea what the breakdown would be in general for that demographic (female health care employees).