Wrong. No vaccine offers 100% coverage, and ivermectin so far appears to lessen severity of disease regardless of variant, so taking both is a good plan.
If the disease isn’t that severe, then why take the risk taking the experimental the vaccine? The drug companies must agree because they are trying to bury the treatment.
My issues with the vaccine-fanatic crowd include their 1) cheering on of indiscriminate administration of these vaccines on individuals regardless of age or condition 2) refusal to critically examine the wisdom behind putting everyone on the same two-dose/three week regimens, without concern for things like weight, prior infection, etc...3) Refusal to see the value that even just one dose may flat out just be effective for most! 4) Refusal to take concerns like menstrual irregularities and long term unknowns seriously.
Also refusal to *differentiate between the vaccines.* The Faucian notion that one should just take “the first available” without diving into the intricacies of each mechanism (mRNA and adenovirus) is shameful. Especially doctors who refuse to do their homework on behalf of their patients that may be at greater risk for specific side effects like clotting.
The frenzy to subject young people to larger than necessary risk and toll on their immune systems is criminal. These shots are being mandated by universities, and in talks for primary and secondary schools. Some places mandate them for students and not the staff!