The question is not How, the Question is Why?
The whole premise upon which “Global Warming” and/or “Climate Change” is a total LIE.
They have now solution options but to continue to use fossil fuels, unless they want to use Nuke fuel. (another can of worms.)
This is not about the environment, it is about destroying capitalism.
UN long ago admitted it.
UN Christiana Figueres “admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism”
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/
I know a LOT about science. The following arguments I use have never been defeated;
Summary: If AGW was science there would be one model and it would be predictive. AGE is neither. The linear “it is getting hotter” is meaningless and useless as a scientific tool.
In detail:
1) Scientifically describe the base climate sans humans
2) Scientifically describe the current climste
3) Scientifically explain the delta
4) What will be the effects of climate in 2030. Why have zero AGW ptedictions come to pass?
They cannot.
Important note:There is no such thing as scientific “consensus.” The person who uses that term admits they are scientifically illiterate and aping talking points.
Texas Fossil : "UN Christiana Figueres “admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity
but to destroy capitalism”. ( Emphasis mine)
(Wikipedia): "Karen Christiana Figueres Olsen is a Costa Rican diplomat who has led national, international and multilateral policy negotiations.
She was appointed Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in July 2010,
six months after the failed COP15 in Copenhagen ".
Yeah, almost like the socialist government officials can control the climate !
They ignore the fact that this is a carbon world,.. Idiots !