Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Subway can do one of two things:

1. Decertify the franchises involved and assume full control of their supply chain...

2. Admit the product was sourced through their authorized supply chain...then proved it’s fixed.

Or the 3rd option comes into play: Go out of business.


35 posted on 06/24/2021 12:01:52 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner
Why should Subway do anything but file a strong counter-claim for business defamation. The Kali suits are a lie. Quelle surprise...

"Yet customers coast-to-coast want to know what’s up, so Inside Edition conducted our own test to see if something fishy was going on. Our investigative unit bought the tuna at three Subway locations in Queens, New York.

When we asked an employee about the tuna controversy, he brought out the packaging showing the listed ingredients: tuna, water and salt. Our next step was sending the samples to Applied Food Technologies. The Florida-based lab specializes in conducting DNA testing of fish.

So, did the tuna in the tuna sandwiches that we tested actually contain tuna?

Yes, we confirmed that tuna was definitely in all three samples we received," LeeAnn Applewhite, the CEO of the lab (Applied Food Technologies), told Inside Edition."


48 posted on 06/24/2021 12:33:32 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Eric Coomer of Dominion Voting Systems Is The Blue Dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson