[StAnDeliver]

Why should Subway do anything but file a strong counter-claim for business defamation. The Kali suits are a lie. Quelle surprise...

"Yet customers coast-to-coast want to know what’s up, so Inside Edition conducted our own test to see if something fishy was going on. Our investigative unit bought the tuna at three Subway locations in Queens, New York.

When we asked an employee about the tuna controversy, he brought out the packaging showing the listed ingredients: tuna, water and salt. Our next step was sending the samples to Applied Food Technologies. The Florida-based lab specializes in conducting DNA testing of fish.

So, did the tuna in the tuna sandwiches that we tested actually contain tuna?

“Yes, we confirmed that tuna was definitely in all three samples we received," LeeAnn Applewhite, the CEO of the lab (Applied Food Technologies), told Inside Edition."

[Mariner]

“Why should Subway do anything but file a strong counter-claim for business defamation.”

Well, because it may not have been tuna at that franchise.

They’d be foolish to claim such an outfit under the corporate banner and what must be federal court.

And I’ve never seen a defamation suit prevail if the facts are provable.

Subway does not know whether they are.

[StAnDeliver]

Subway: “Unfortunately, this lawsuit is part of a trend in which the named plaintiffs' attorneys have been targeting the food industry in an effort to make a name for themselves in that space."

With two Bollywood plaintiffs who look like and probably smell like what they eat at Subway, and their 2 shysters Shalini Dogra and Alex Brown.