[Olog-hai]

In response, take note. And in an historical context; since you ripped away the context, I was referring to the 16^th and 17^th Amendments, which women had absolutely no part in imposing but the white males I was referring to.

You are starting to border on obsession, with all due respect, merely because I rejected your left-wing sources. What is your purpose for being on FR?

[SoCal Pubbie]

My purpose for being here is to learn, and to sort out fact from fiction. I appreciate those with particular knowledge of a subject. Sometimes it’s the law, others facets of science or medicine. Any topic really.

Then there are those who hold that their views are correct simply on the basis of self confirmation. No data is cited, no supporting evidence provided. They often accuse others of personal insult just before launching a string of ad hominem attacks.

That type provides endless entertainment.

[SoCal Pubbie]

Mariner wrote “Remove the female vote and there would not be a Democrat in any office of the country.” Note that the context was today, not a hundred years ago.

You replied “Absolutely untrue. The base of the Democratic Party has always been white left-wing males.”

Your own words state that Mariner’s remarks where untrue. Therefore any objective reader understands that you meant ALWAYS, including the present day. Had you written something like “had traditionally been white left-wing males” that might be different.

Of course that raises the question. Were there really any left-wing white males in the Democratic Party in 1920. Most would have been socials, communists, or perhaps anarchists. So your defense doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny.

What you like to rephrase your post 16?